W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: FatalSubjectivities

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.


Welcome!


{| style="background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"
|class="MainPageBG" style="border:1px solid lightgrey; background-color:lightgrey; vertical-align:top; color:#000000; font-size:85%"|
{| style="width: 100%; padding: 0px; vertical-align:top; background-color:lavender; padding:0;"
! <div style="margin:0; background-color:white; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:normal; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top:0.2em; padding-bottom:0.2em;">Hello, Anti-Plantinga! '''Welcome to Wikipedia!''' Thank you for your contributions ↗. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place '''<code>{&#123;helpme&#125;}</code>''' on your talk page ↗ and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name ↗ on talk pages by clicking 22px|link=Wikipedia:How to sign your posts|alt= ↗ or by typing four tildes "~&#126;~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted ↗" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject ↗ to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here ↗ for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary ↗ field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 21:37, 8 January 2021 (UTC)</div>
|}
{| width="100%" style="background-color:white;"
|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid white; background-color:lightgrey; vertical-align:top"|
{| style="width: 100%; padding: 0px; vertical-align:top; background-color:Lavender"
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting Started</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
|-
! <div style="margin: 0; background:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting Help</div>
|-
| style="color:#000"|


|-
! <div style="margin: 0; background:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Policies and Guidelines</div>
|-
| style="color:#000"|
----
|-
|}
|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid lightgrey; background-color:Seashell; vertical-align:top"|
{| style="width: 100%; padding: 0px; vertical-align:top; background-color:Seashell"
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">The Community</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
|-
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Things to do</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
|-
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Miscellaneous</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
|}
|}
|}<!--Template:WelcomeMenu-->

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Anatheism ↗ (January 27)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Liance was:

{{divbox|gray|3=Neologisms ↗ are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources ↗. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.|}}<!--
--
-->&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=Nearly every provided reference is a primary source/self-published, doesn't demonstrate notability.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''when they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

-Liance<sup>talk ↗/contribs ↗</sup> 15:49, 27 January 2021 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo ↗
| <div style="background-color:#e1e6db; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello, '''Anti-Plantinga'''!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the '''Articles for creation help desk ↗'''. If you have any ''other'' questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the '''Teahouse ↗''', a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liance<sup>talk ↗/contribs ↗</sup> 15:49, 27 January 2021 (UTC)</div>
|}<!-- Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation -->
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC ↗

Anatheism



Hello, I noticed this draft that was declined. If independent sources that have significant coverage of the topic cannot be found, a suggestion would be improving the main author's article (Richard Kearney ↗) to add some details about his work. Articles about subtopics that don't independently meet notability requirements (WP:GNG ↗) are usually merged into the most relevant article, this would have the same result. But articles in the draft space also don't immediately vanish unless there's a good reason, they become eligible for WP:G13 ↗ after about six months of inactivity. —<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#44a;text-shadow:2px 2px 3px DimGray;">Paleo</span><span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#272;text-shadow:2px 2px 3px DimGray;">Neonate</span> – 16:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 19



Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Theodicy ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agency ↗<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Theodicy check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Theodicy?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

March 2021


<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">left|40px|alt=|link= ↗<p>Your account has been '''blocked indefinitely''' because the chosen username is a clear violation of our username policy ↗&nbsp;– it is obviously profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia (see our blocking ↗ and username ↗ policies for more information).</p><p>We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling ↗ or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block ↗&nbsp;– read our guide to appealing blocks ↗ to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock-un|2=<var>new username</var>|3=reason=<var>your reason here</var> &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;}} at the end of your user talk page ↗. The Blade of the Northern Lights (<span style="font-family: MS Mincho; color: black;">話して下さい</span>) 21:08, 17 March 2021 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-uhblock -->

Concern regarding Draft:Anatheism ↗


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Anti-Plantinga. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anatheism ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space ↗.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13 ↗. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication ↗ of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here ↗.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Anatheism ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, Anti-Plantinga. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or Draft ↗ page you started, "Anatheism ↗".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace ↗, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Db-draft-deleted --><!-- Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 18:33, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

A Kind request to Unblock user



{{unblock-un reviewed | user=FatalSubjectivities | reason=Old username was not intended to be harmful, defamatory or identity-thieving to any individual. Nonetheless, I will not use old username since it may be inadvertently seen as harmful or libelous. I will instead use a new username. Post-script: I would prefer if my Contributions page is not wiped clean in my unblocking, if it is possible.Anti-Plantinga (talk) 15:39, 12 December 2021 (UTC) | accept=Allowing username change to requested username. Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username ↗ as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. Daniel Case (talk) 07:30, 19 December 2021 (UTC)}}

As the blocking administrator, no objections from me. The Blade of the Northern Lights (<span style="font-family: MS Mincho; color: black;">話して下さい</span>) 14:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

May 2022



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Padgriffin. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions ↗—specifically <span class="plainlinks">this edit ↗</span> to :Elizabeth Stuart (theologian) ↗—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox ↗. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk ↗. Thanks. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --><span style="color: gray">Padgriffin</span> <sup><span style='color: Orange'>Griffin's Nest</span></sup> ↗ 11:11, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022



25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Sea Cow. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, :David Bentley Hart ↗, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source ↗. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people ↗, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page ↗. Thank you. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-bio-1 --><!-- Template:uw-biog1 -->Sea Cow (talk) 03:11, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

<div style="clear: both"></div>25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with <span class="plainlinks">this edit ↗</span> to :David Bentley Hart ↗. Your edits appear to be vandalism ↗ and have been reverted ↗ or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox ↗. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges ↗. Thank you. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-2 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 -->Sea Cow (talk) 03:13, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Removed my edits. Thanks for reminding me FatalSubjectivities (talk) 14:57, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Important Notice


{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.''

You have shown interest in '''gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them.''' Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions ↗ is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions ↗ on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies ↗, or the page-specific restrictions ↗, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{tlx|Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions ↗ and the Arbitration Committee's ↗ decision here ↗. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> <span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span> talk 15:03, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 30



Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Postchristianity ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Revival ↗<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Postchristianity check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Postchristianity?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Links to draft articles



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not introduce links ↗ in actual articles to draft ↗ articles, as you did to :Sunny Side Up ↗. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style ↗. {{#ifeq:{{lc:}}|yes|An edit has converted these links, into links to the not-currently-existing page (redlinks) where the draft will be placed if it is eventually accepted. Thus the links will automatically become valid links aimed at the correct target when and if the draft is accepted.|These links have been removed.}} Thank you.<!-- Template:Uw-draft-link --> - Arjayay (talk) 10:53, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

About deleting redirects



I noticed that you recently tried to {{tl|prod}} the redirect {{no redirect|Deconstructionism}}. Redirects are very cheap, and although there are sometimes good reasons to delete one, what is your reasoning here? There are currently <span class="plainlinks">dozens of articles ↗</span> that link to this redirect, such as Immanuel_Kant#Influence_and_legacy ↗ for example. If you are successful in removing the redirect, 65 pages will have links that go from blue to red. Are you prepared to resolve the redlink problem by editing all those articles and adding a pipe to the red link, to make them blue again? In general, it's best to do a bit of research first to see how the redirect is being used, before considering it for deletion. Hope this helps, Mathglot (talk) 23:15, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 26



An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
:Cyril O'Regan ↗<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Cyril_O%27Regan check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Cyril_O%27Regan?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->
::added a link pointing to David Walsh ↗
:Jainism and non-creationism ↗<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Jainism_and_non-creationism check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Jainism_and_non-creationism?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->
::added a link pointing to Transmigration ↗

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2022 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2022|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/08&oldid=1124425185 -->

Buzzwords



Social constructionism ↗ is a standard theory in Sociology ↗, whether one accepts it or not, and should not be tagged with {{tl|buzzword}}, unless you can achieve consensus ↗ for it at Talk. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 09:53, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

:That's precisely my point. I wholeheartedly agree that sociologists can be able to use the standard definition. But the term ''social construct'' in many cases is a mere eye-catching MOS:JARGON ↗ when WP:PLAINENGLISH ↗ could have been used. FatalSubjectivities (talk) 06:10, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Help me with merging Template:Exceptionalism and Template:Ethnocentrism



{{help me-helped}}
Please help me with with merging Template:Exceptionalism ↗ and Template:Ethnocentrism ↗ FatalSubjectivities (talk) 17:10, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
: While the two topics overlap in a few respects, they are different enough to merit separate templates. What is your reasoning for wanting to merge them? '''<span style="color:#2eb85c">—&nbsp;jmcgnh</span> ↗<sup><small><span style="color:#1e5213">(talk)</span> ↗&nbsp;<span style="color:#73b516">(contribs)</span> ↗</small></sup>''' 18:17, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
::As in, the topics page links that are listed inside them. FatalSubjectivities (talk) 06:16, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
::I think their overlap is very substantial. FatalSubjectivities (talk) 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Help me with post-WP:MOVE ↗ with ''Bejahung ↗''


{{help me-helped}}


Below is what I see and I cannot do it:


_____________________________________________________


← Nietzschean affirmation ↗

Jump to navigation ↗Jump to search ↗

The page "'''Nietzschean affirmation ↗'''" <small>(links ↗ | edit ↗)</small> has been moved to "'''Bejahung ↗'''" <small>(edit ↗ | history ↗ | links ↗ | revert ↗ | log ↗) (move log ↗)</small>
{| class="wikitable"
|
|Please '''clean up''' ↗ after your move:

|}
A redirect has been created.

Your move should now be reflected in the Wikidata item ↗ language link.

FatalSubjectivities (talk) 17:19, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

FatalSubjectivities (talk) 17:24, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

:On a related note, Is my IP address revealed? WP:IRCHD ↗ says yes, if one uses it. Did I use it? FatalSubjectivities (talk) 17:29, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
:Pages that link to "Nietzschean affirmation" - Wikipedia ↗ FatalSubjectivities (talk) 17:31, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

:: A bot should take care of any dangling redirects to the old name. Check again in a few days to see if anything was missed. Other than that, it doesn't look like anything still remains to be done after the move, but you might want to post your move justification on the talk page in addition to the edit summary. You'll be able to explain more fully that way. I'd have thought a page that has been hanging around since 2007 would have merited a requested moves ↗ discussion, but now I guess we'll see if anyone even notices.
:: I did not see you mention your on-wiki username on IRC; that would be how someone might connect your username and the IP address you were using at the time. '''<span style="color:#2eb85c">—&nbsp;jmcgnh</span> ↗<sup><small><span style="color:#1e5213">(talk)</span> ↗&nbsp;<span style="color:#73b516">(contribs)</span> ↗</small></sup>''' 18:09, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
:::Thank you FatalSubjectivities (talk) 05:49, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 3



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cyril O'Regan ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Walsh ↗<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Cyril_O%27Regan check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Cyril_O%27Regan?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Help with Deletion of redirects



{{help me-helped}}
I think this could be deleted : Absolute (philosophy - Wikipedia ↗

There is already Absolute (philosophy) - Wikipedia ↗


______

This could too be deleted DeconstructionIsm - Wikipedia ↗

There is already
Deconstructionism - Wikipedia ↗

I clicked "(See § When should we delete a redirect? for more information.)" on WP:RfD ↗ but it brings me to the same place. Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion - Wikipedia ↗

And I was not allowed to put WP:PROD ↗ on redirects to delete them. Hence this-which-I-am-writing-now.

Thanks.

FatalSubjectivities (talk) 16:02, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
:WP:RFDHOWTO ↗ describes how to nominate a page for deletion. Twinkle ↗ can also be used to assist in the process. If you want more help,&nbsp;change the {{t|help me-helped}} back into a {{t|help me}}, stop by the Teahouse ↗, or Wikipedia's live help channel ↗, or the help desk ↗ to ask someone for assistance.&nbsp;Primefac (talk) 16:31, 3 December 2022 (UTC)<!--Template:helpmessage-->
:: Also remember to state your reasons for deleting the redirect. Most redirects exist because someone thought there was a justification for them, such as the missing close paren. I think that reasoning is possibly faulty, but it's incumbent on you to address the original reasoning, not just stand on the mere reasonableness of removing the redirect. '''<span style="color:#2eb85c">—&nbsp;jmcgnh</span> ↗<sup><small><span style="color:#1e5213">(talk)</span> ↗&nbsp;<span style="color:#73b516">(contribs)</span> ↗</small></sup>''' 16:45, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

A suggestion



I find some of your Edit summaries over-long, epecially those with references. Perhaps keep the ES's short and refer to evidence you put on the Talk pages. David notMD (talk) 15:42, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

:Noted
:Tks for informing FatalSubjectivities (talk) 15:02, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
:Actually, why ought they be short? i want to be able to more easily track my edit histories. FatalSubjectivities (talk) 16:05, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
:Is it because they are taking up wp:weight ↗ FatalSubjectivities (talk) 09:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 10



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jean Baudrillard ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transfinite ↗<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Jean_Baudrillard check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Jean_Baudrillard?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Sunny Side Up (Singaporean TV series) ↗ (January 7)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Robertsky was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article ↗—that is, they do not show ''significant'' coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ''published'', ''reliable'' ↗, ''secondary'' ↗ sources that are ''independent ↗'' of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films ↗). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help ↗ and learn about mistakes to avoid ↗ when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!--
--
-->&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=For shows that have been broadcasted, please include at least two reviews to sustain the notability of the show. See WP:NFO ↗ for other possible evidence of notability.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

– robertsky (talk) 05:13, 7 January 2023 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

February 2023



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from :John Searle ↗ into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing ↗ does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary ↗ at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking ↗ to the copied page, e.g., <code>copied content from <nowiki>page name ↗</nowiki>; see that page's history for attribution</code>. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{tl|copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia ↗. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-copying --> /wiae&nbsp;<small>/tlk</small> 11:47, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

:Will give a go. FatalSubjectivities (talk) 17:08, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
:Many users were involved. WikiBlame (ramselehof.de) ↗
:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Searle&diff=prev&oldid=106217729
:<div class="results">
:The version history of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John Searle">John Searle</a> is being searched for <b>Derrida</b> as plain text<br>
:498 versions found<br><b>Derrida</b> was already present in the oldest revision searched dating from <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Searle&amp;diff=prev&amp;oldid=692287524">17:51, 24 November 2015</a>.<br>There are probably older revisions. 500 versions found<br><b>Derrida</b> was already present in the oldest revision searched dating from <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Searle&amp;diff=prev&amp;oldid=323168974">21:26, 31 October 2009</a>.<br>There are probably older revisions. 500 versions found<br>Comparing differences in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Searle&amp;diff=prev&amp;oldid=153074897">03:43, 23 August 2007</a> between 250 and 251 while coming from 499:<span class="found">OO</span>
:<br>Comparing differences in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Searle&amp;diff=prev&amp;oldid=62578579">16:31, 07 July 2006</a> between 374 and 375 while coming from 250:<span class="notfound">XX</span>
:<br>Comparing differences in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Searle&amp;diff=prev&amp;oldid=112746961">05:31, 05 March 2007</a> between 312 and 313 while coming from 374:<span class="found">OO</span>
:<br>Comparing differences in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Searle&amp;diff=prev&amp;oldid=93783645">09:54, 12 December 2006</a> between 343 and 344 while coming from 312:<span class="notfound">XX</span>
:<br>Comparing differences in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Searle&amp;diff=prev&amp;oldid=106217729">02:32, 07 February 2007</a> between 327 and 328 while coming from 343:<span class="found">OO</span>
:<br>Comparing differences in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Searle&amp;diff=prev&amp;oldid=98136444">08:27, 03 January 2007</a> between 335 and 336 while coming from 327:<span class="found">OO</span>
:<br>Comparing differences in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Searle&amp;diff=prev&amp;oldid=95426948">01:28, 20 December 2006</a> between 339 and 340 while coming from 335:<span class="notfound">X</span><span class="found">O</span><br>
:Insertion found between <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Searle&amp;oldid=95334557">17:07, 19 December 2006</a> and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Searle&amp;oldid=95426948">01:28, 20 December 2006</a>: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Searle&amp;diff=prev&amp;oldid=95426948"><b>here</b></a><br><a href="http://wikipedia.ramselehof.de/wikiblame.php?project=wikipedia&amp;article=John+Searle&amp;needle=Derrida&amp;lang=en&amp;limit=500&amp;offjahr=2006&amp;offmon=12&amp;offtag=20&amp;offhour=01&amp;offmin=28&amp;searchmethod=int&amp;order=desc&amp;force_wikitags=off&amp;user_lang=en">[Search from here]</a><br>Execution time: 8 seconds<br><br><small>http://wikipedia.ramselehof.de/wikiblame.php?project=wikipedia&amp;article=John+Searle&amp;needle=Derrida&amp;lang=en&amp;limit=500&amp;offjahr=2023&amp;offmon=2&amp;offtag=10&amp;offhour=23&amp;offmin=55&amp;searchmethod=int&amp;order=desc&amp;force_wikitags=off&amp;user_lang=en&amp;ignorefirst=0</small></div> FatalSubjectivities (talk) 18:31, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Milbank–Žižek debates ↗ (February 18)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reasons left by HitroMilanese were:

{{divbox|gray|3=This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article ↗. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: <br />
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid ↗ when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!--
-->{{divbox|gray|3=This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox ↗ for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.|}}<!--
--
-->&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=Not sure what the draft creator wants to do here. Please see WP:YFA ↗.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

<b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> ↗ 06:32, 18 February 2023 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Manualism in moral theology ↗ (March 13)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by GoingBatty was:

{{divbox|gray|3='''SEVENTEEN''' citations for one sentence is citation overkill ↗. Please add more content from the sources and/or remove excessive citations. Thanks!|}}<!--
--
--> Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

GoingBatty (talk) 04:32, 13 March 2023 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

AfC ↗ notification: Draft:Manualism in moral theology ↗ has a new comment


<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;padding-bottom:1em;color:black;margin-bottom: 1.5em;"> 50px|left ↗
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Manualism in moral theology ↗. Thanks! —Caorongjin 💬 ↗ 20:35, 15 March 2023 (UTC) </div>

Using the talk page for the Meta-historical fall article


Thank you for your continued input with the Meta-historical_fall ↗ article, and please note the two most recent comments on the article talk page ↗ in relation to your additions:
I'd like to review most additions together on the talk page as the length and sprawling nature of this article has been a serious concern in the past, and I do not want it to grow to be a concern again. --Jjhake (talk ↗) 13:29, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Male and Female He Created Them ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Male and Female He Created Them ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Qwerfjkl_(bot)&section=new report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:13, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Manualism in moral theology ↗ (April 26)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article ↗. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: <br />
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid ↗ when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!--
--
-->&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=So... what actually is it? May be better to merge it somewhere else if it cannot justify a standalone article. Needs more explanation of what it actually is (not fixed from the last review it seems), and what people think about it.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 06:53, 26 April 2023 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

Recent PROD at Applied postmodernism



Just wanted to let you know that I have removed the PROD tag you placed on the redirect Applied postmodernism - that tag is not applicable to redirects. I also notice that your reason provided was a notability concern, please note that notability is not an issue with redirects, which are only designed to guide readers to a more suitable location anyway (often, non-notable articles are converted to redirects, as well). If you're still looking for the page to be deleted, please list a new discussion at WP:RFD ↗. Thanks! Tollens (talk) 09:13, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

May 2023



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hi FatalSubjectivities! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at :The Onion ↗ that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections ↗ or reverting obvious vandalism ↗. Any edit that changes the ''meaning'' of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit ↗ for more information. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-minor --> &mdash; <span style="border-bottom:1px solid #666666">'''Garrett W.''' {☎ ↗ ✍ ↗}</span> 06:01, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ of :Category:Christian continental philosophers and theologians ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

The page :Category:Christian continental philosophers and theologians ↗ has been deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Category%3AChristian+continental+philosophers+and+theologians|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review ↗. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 22:18, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Reification (Marxism) ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Reification (Marxism) ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/sandbox/43&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20FatalSubjectivities&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Reification (Marxism)}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1167227343 report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:01, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Milbank–Žižek debates ↗


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, FatalSubjectivities. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Milbank–Žižek debates ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again&#32;or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Milbank–Žižek debates ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, FatalSubjectivities. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or Draft ↗ page you started, "Milbank–Žižek debates ↗".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace ↗, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Db-draft-deleted --><!-- Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 16:19, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

wrong hatnote



you shouldn't be using this template ↗. 204.209.132.57 ↗ (talk) 19:16, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Manualism in moral theology ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, FatalSubjectivities. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or Draft ↗ page you started, "Manualism in moral theology ↗".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace ↗, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Db-draft-deleted --><!-- Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom --> <span style="color:#000000">✗</span><span style="color:white;background:black;font-family:felix titling;font-size:80%">plicit</span> 01:23, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2023 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2023|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Illusion Flame@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/07&oldid=1187132415 -->

Article reorganisation proposal for Pope Francis and LGBT topics ↗



link=|25px|alt=Information icon ↗ There is currently a discussion at Talk:Pope Francis and LGBT topics ↗ regarding a reorganisation of the article.&nbsp;The thread is Article reorganisation proposal ↗. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice-->

I am seeking consensus for a significant reorganisation of the article. I would be grateful for your comments, as an experienced editor who has contributed to this article before. IgnatiusofLondon (talk) 14:23, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

?



I genuinely do not see a pun ↗. DS (talk) 02:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Merge proposals



I note that with this edit ↗, adding a merge proposal, you missed a few steps that would be really helpful for those considering merge proposals:
Adding these steps ensure that the relevant readerships see the proposal and understand exactly what is expected, while provign a forum for discussion.
See WP:MERGEPROP ↗ for more details or rationale. Klbrain (talk) 10:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Bayard Rustin and AIDS



hello, user:FatalSubjectivities ↗: You made an edit to Bayard Rustin ↗ that properly noted a drafting error, but the change you made still leaves that sentence and the following sentence grammatically confused (verb tense, inter alia). More important, it is unclear whether those sentences are intended to be supported by the next footnote, attached to a direct quotation which is another separate sentence. Can you check that source and clarify? In particular, was it intended to say he became "an advocate for people with AIDS," as you phrased it? Or that he became an advocate for increased funding for AIDS research, perhaps? Or an advocate against discrimination targeting individuals who were HIV-positive? Or something else? The original wording that you changed might have been intended to mean any of those. Please clarify, and cite the source that supports you. And perhaps straighten out those two sentences in general, if you can. PDGPA (talk) 18:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

:Thanks for pointing out. The word advocate can mean proponent, or mean "someone who speaks for, supports, or represents a person or group of people who may need extra help or protection" ↗. Hence, in my opinion, the grammar of the current revision for that sentence in the Rustin page is acceptable.<br/>(On the contrary, "AIDS" is not a group of people - previously, when the page stated that he "advocated for AIDS", the only comprehensible and grammatically correct meaning - 'support" - is silly. )<br/>I admit that I did not read any original source.<br/> FatalSubjectivities (talk) 07:47, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 25



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khaled Abou El Fadl ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Embedded anchors in section headings



Hi, FatalSubjectivities, and thanks for your contributions. I noticed several edits in which you renamed section headings, which is fine, and I see you tried to comply with the spirit of MOS:SECTIONHEADER ↗ by adding an anchor to the heading, so that inlinks, if any, would still work. Unfortunately, the *routine* addition of embedded anchors is neither necessary, nor desirable, as it creates a complex section heading that many editors don't know how to handle. In addition, there usually aren't any inlinks, so the anchor is not needed. Finally, Adding a bare, unsubsted anchor (i.e., in the format {{tlc|anchor|Foo}}{{hairspace}}) also obfuscates the edit summary in the history.

Adding a properly formatted anchor can be useful so that incoming links will still work after a heading name change, but this is best used when "{{xt|there are many links to the old title}} ↗". When there are none, an anchor is unnecessary, and when there are just a couple, it's best to adjust the links in other articles to the new section name, rather than embed an anchor in the target article heading. Finally, when there are so many incoming links that it would be too time-consuming to fix them all, then please use the {{tls|anchor}} or &lt;span id=...> style recommended at MOS:SECTIONANCHOR ↗, and not {{tlc|anchor|Foo}} format, which causes the "undesirable behavior" that you can read about at the guideline.

I have removed unneeded embedded anchors from Ek Villain ↗, PDF ↗, Qiyas ↗, General semantics ↗, Iranian reformists ↗, Sufi metaphysics ↗, John Milbank ↗, Salafi movement ↗, Gilles Deleuze ↗, and Friedrich Nietzsche's views on women ↗ either because they had no incoming links from other articles, or if they did, after adjusting the inlinks (there was one article with a section link to an anchor at General semantics ↗; it was adjusted to the new section name).

While embedded section anchors have their uses, please don't add them willy-nilly, and most of all, please avoid adding them when there are no incoming links to it at all. There is an explanatory note at MOS:#Section headings ↗ that explains how to find out if a given article section has any inlinks or not; you can find the note here ↗, or just execute <span class=plainlinks>this advanced search ↗</span>, and change {{smallcaps|article}} to the name of the article, and {{smallcaps|oldsection}} to the old section title. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 01:01, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

:Noted. Will adopt new practices. <br/><small>I Now know really how advanced the advanced search is.</small> FatalSubjectivities (talk) 08:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/07&oldid=1258243692 -->

Clarification needed


In your edit ↗ to :Orson Scott Card ↗, you added a '''clarification needed''' tag to a direct quote. Could you add '''|reason=''your explanation of why the quote needs clarification''''' to the tag to explain to other editors what you think the problem is? Thanks. <span style="color:#066293;">'''Schazjmd'''</span>&nbsp;<span style="color:#738276;">''(talk)''</span> 17:55, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Great Retreat (1930s Russia) ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article ↗.</p><p>You may want to consider using the Article Wizard ↗ to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}
A tag has been placed on :Great Retreat (1930s Russia) ↗ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement ↗. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of ''information'', but not as a source of ''sentences''. This part is crucial: ''say it in your own words''. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators '''will be blocked from editing ↗'''.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you ''must'' verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials ↗. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission ↗ for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy ↗ for more details, or ask a question here ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗. <!-- Template:Db-copyvio-notice --> * Pppery * <sub style="color:#800000">it has begun...</sub> 21:01, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright



30px|link=|alt=Control copyright icon ↗ Hello FatalSubjectivities! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright ↗ and plagiarism ↗ issues. Here are the key points:
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked ↗ from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-copyright-new --> Whpq (talk) 21:32, 22 March 2025 (UTC)


Delete Definist fallacy ↗?



Hi - you might be interested in my deletion proposal at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Definist_fallacy, since you're the only person in recentish times to have engaged in any substantive way with that article, even if your edits were fairly minor. (The author is gone and other recent editors have just touched reference formatting and suchlike.) ExplodingCabbage (talk) 16:27, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived



{| style="margin: 1em 4em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo|link=w:en:WP:Teahouse|File:WP teahouse logo 2.png by User:Heatherawalls, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 ↗
| <div style="background-color: #fcfbed; color: #393D38; padding: 0.4em 1em; border-radius: 10px; font-size: 1.1em;">
Hello '''FatalSubjectivities'''! The thread you created at the Teahouse ↗, {{tq|Help with deleting redirect.}}, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion ↗. If you have follow-up questions, please {{Edit |1=Wikipedia:Teahouse |2=create a new thread |section=new |preload=Wikipedia:Teahouse/Preload |preloadtitle=Follow-up to Help with deleting redirect. ↗}}.

<small>
See also the help page about the archival process. ↗
The archival was done by {{noping|lowercase sigmabot III}}, and this notification was delivered by {{noping|KiranBOT}}, both automated accounts ↗. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:07, 8 September 2025 (UTC)</small>

<div><small></small></div>
</div>
|}
<!-- KiranBOTmsgID:1309476181 --><!-- User:KiranBOT/Teahouse_archival_notification -->

Nomination of :J. Moufawad-Paul ↗ for deletion


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :J. Moufawad-Paul ↗, to which you have significantly contributed ↗, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or if it should be deleted ↗.

The discussion will take place at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. Moufawad-Paul ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by ''SDZeroBot'' (talk) 01:01, 8 October 2025 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template -->

Disambiguation link notification for November 1



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Economic liberalisation in India ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bretton Woods ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/07&oldid=1322758895 -->

Happy First Edit Anniversary FatalSubjectivities 🎉



Hey @FatalSubjectivities. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 5 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey. :) -<span style="color:#990000">❙❚❚</span><span style="color:#339966">❙❙</span><span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000"> GnOeee </span><span style="color:#006699">❚❙❚</span><span style="color:#339966">❙❙</span> ✉ 19:13, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Discussion on List of best-selling books



I've started a discussion on talk:List of best-selling books ↗ under the heading "Blanket ban on "books of a religious, ideological, philosophical or political nature"" that you may be interested in. DervotNum4 (talk) 22:30, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

January 2026



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello. I have noticed that you {{usertalk other|often ↗|often}} edit without using an edit summary ↗. Please do your best to {{strong|always fill in the summary field}}. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences ↗. Thanks! <!-- Template:Uw-editsummary2 --> Amigao (talk) 19:00, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Merge proposal protocol


Just a reminder that WP:M1 ↗ requires a discussion on the talk page of the target, not the ''reason'' field in one of the template. That's because merges should be discussed, and the discussion doesn't take place inside a template. Note that I'm responding to this edit ↗. Might you be able to add a case at Talk:Gustavo Bueno ↗? Klbrain (talk) 12:20, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived



{| style="margin: 1em 4em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo|link=w:en:WP:Teahouse|File:WP teahouse logo 2.png by User:Heatherawalls, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 ↗
| <div style="background-color: #fcfbed; color: #393D38; padding: 0.4em 1em; border-radius: 10px; font-size: 1.1em;">
Hello '''FatalSubjectivities'''! The thread you created at the Teahouse ↗, {{tq|Request deletion for a redirect - where should I go?}}, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion ↗. If you have follow-up questions, please {{Edit |1=Wikipedia:Teahouse |2=create a new thread |section=new |preload=Wikipedia:Teahouse/Preload |preloadtitle=Follow-up to Request deletion for a redirect - where should I go? ↗}}.

<small>
See also the help page about the archival process. ↗
The archival was done by {{noping|lowercase sigmabot III}}, and this notification was delivered by {{noping|KiranBOT}}, both automated accounts ↗. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 22 February 2026 (UTC)</small>

<div><small></small></div>
</div>
|}
<!-- KiranBOTmsgID:1338511856 --><!-- User:KiranBOT/Teahouse_archival_notification -->

Your thread has been archived



{| style="margin: 1em 4em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo|link=w:en:WP:Teahouse|File:WP teahouse logo 2.png by User:Heatherawalls, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 ↗
| <div style="background-color: #fcfbed; color: #393D38; padding: 0.4em 1em; border-radius: 10px; font-size: 1.1em;">
Hello '''FatalSubjectivities'''! The thread you created at the Teahouse ↗, {{tq|Proposed delete of redirect page}}, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion ↗. If you have follow-up questions, please {{Edit |1=Wikipedia:Teahouse |2=create a new thread |section=new |preload=Wikipedia:Teahouse/Preload |preloadtitle=Follow-up to Proposed delete of redirect page ↗}}.

<small>
See also the help page about the archival process. ↗
The archival was done by {{noping|lowercase sigmabot III}}, and this notification was delivered by {{noping|KiranBOT}}, both automated accounts ↗. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:03, 28 February 2026 (UTC)</small>

<div><small></small></div>
</div>
|}
<!-- KiranBOTmsgID:1340050336 --><!-- User:KiranBOT/Teahouse_archival_notification -->

Edit summaries



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello. I have noticed that you {{usertalk other|often ↗|often}} edit without using an edit summary ↗. Please do your best to {{strong|always fill in the summary field}}. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to set {{Preferences|3|check={{int:tog-forceeditsummary}}}}. Thanks! <!-- Template:Uw-editsummary2 --> Pipoin (talk) 19:15, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 2



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Secession in China ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Diplomat ↗ was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived



{| style="margin: 1em 4em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo|link=w:en:WP:Teahouse|File:WP teahouse logo 2.png by User:Heatherawalls, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 ↗
| <div style="background-color: #fcfbed; color: #393D38; padding: 0.4em 1em; border-radius: 10px; font-size: 1.1em;">
Hello '''FatalSubjectivities'''! The thread you created at the Teahouse ↗, {{tq|Editing one's sections}}, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion ↗. If you have follow-up questions, please {{Edit |1=Wikipedia:Teahouse |2=create a new thread |section=new |preload=Wikipedia:Teahouse/Preload |preloadtitle=Follow-up to Editing one's sections ↗}}.

<small>
See also the help page about the archival process. ↗
The archival was done by {{noping|lowercase sigmabot III}}, and this notification was delivered by {{noping|KiranBOT}}, both automated accounts ↗. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 24 March 2026 (UTC)</small>

<div><small></small></div>
</div>
|}
<!-- KiranBOTmsgID:1344425143 --><!-- User:KiranBOT/Teahouse_archival_notification -->

Disambiguation link notification for March 27



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kuomintang ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taroko ↗ was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 21:38, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived



{| style="margin: 1em 4em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo|link=w:en:WP:Teahouse|File:WP teahouse logo 2.png by User:Heatherawalls, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 ↗
| <div style="background-color: #fcfbed; color: #393D38; padding: 0.4em 1em; border-radius: 10px; font-size: 1.1em;">
Hello '''FatalSubjectivities'''! The thread you created at the Teahouse ↗, {{tq|Proposed Deletion of redirect.}}, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion ↗. If you have follow-up questions, please {{Edit |1=Wikipedia:Teahouse |2=create a new thread |section=new |preload=Wikipedia:Teahouse/Preload |preloadtitle=Follow-up to Proposed Deletion of redirect. ↗}}.

<small>
See also the help page about the archival process. ↗
The archival was done by {{noping|lowercase sigmabot III}}, and this notification was delivered by {{noping|KiranBOT}}, both automated accounts ↗. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 1 July 2026 (UTC)</small>

<div><small></small></div>
</div>
|}
<!-- KiranBOTmsgID:1361255283 --><!-- User:KiranBOT/Teahouse_archival_notification -->