User Talk: Fortek67

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{User:Fortek67/WikiProject Poland}}{{Extended confirmed topicon}}{{New page reviewer topicon}}{{Autopatrolled topicon}}{{Page mover topicon}}{{AWB topicon}}
{{Talk header}}
{{NoACEMM}}
{{bots|deny=KiranBOT}}{{User:Fortek67/notice}}
<div style = "text-align: center">'''↓ Jump to bottom of page ↓''' ↗</div>

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Prędocice (Toporów) ↗ has been accepted

<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Prędocice (Toporów) ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.''' 

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. 

The article has been assessed as '''Start-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop ↗ over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.

<div class="autoconfirmed-show">Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation ↗ if you prefer.</div>

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Pr%C4%99docice_(Topor%C3%B3w) help desk]'''. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request to Articles for creation ↗.

Thanks again, and happy editing!
Absurdum4242 (talk) 09:22, 21 September 2025 (UTC)</div>

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Fortek67. Thank you for your work on Ruszów–Gozdnica railway ↗. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Nice start! Please add sources for a few unsourced sentences. For example, "After World War II, the area was placed under Polish administration as the Oder–Neisse line became the new border between Germany and Poland." does not have a source. Thanks and have a great day!}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Mariamnei<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 11:14, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

:{{Re|Mariamnei}} Cited books at the bottom of the page. Fortek67 (talk) 00:03, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
::Thank you! Mariamnei (talk) 14:22, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Fortek67. Thank you for your work on Penzig family ↗. Another editor, Rosiestep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Please translate foreign language ref titles into English. See my example.}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Rosiestep<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Rosiestep (talk) 23:54, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

:{{Re|Rosiestep}} My German isn't that great. Can I use google translate? Also correct me if I'm wrong but I'm pretty sure that page was reviewed when I published it almost two months ago. Fortek67 (talk) 23:59, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
::Hi. Yes; you certainly can use google translate. Not sure if it was reviewed previously, but I came across it in the "to be reviewed group" for New Page Patrollers. --Rosiestep (talk) 00:02, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
:::Done. Translated titles of both websites and books. Fortek67 (talk) 14:57, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

</div>
</div>

Clarification

Noticed Suzuki mentioned me on her talk page when answering you, so I'd like to set the record straight. 
They created a page titled "Kołomyja Uprising", which was an event that (as far as I can tell) they completely made up with bogus sources. I outlined my rationale in this diff ↗. We then got into a bit of an argument on the article's talk page while I was drunk, we both said some things we should have, and an ANI thread ↗ where I apologised and the other editor was silent. They've since deleted the info from their talk page and, I believe, am attempting to hide all of this from other users. 
TheRealJakub (talk) 12:43, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

:Yeah mate I remember now. Just to clarify on my end when I said "Asking for a friend." I wasn't mentioning you like Suzuki thought I was. I knew I previously saw their name somewhere I just couldn't quite remember were since from were since they deleted their whole talk page which confused me. Thanks, Fortek67 (talk) 14:13, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
::Ah I see; thanks. TheRealJakub (talk) 12:17, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Pieńsk railway station ↗

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Fortek67. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pieńsk railway station ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:09, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

:No worries mate you can delete it Fortek67 (talk) 20:36, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

January 2026

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Danners430. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :Chiltern Railways ↗, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable ↗. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation ↗, your edit is archived in the page history ↗. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Danners430 tweaks made ↗ 18:45, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

:@Danners430, please revert your edit. The source can be found here: https://www.chilternrailways.co.uk/our-fleet/new-trains Fortek67 (talk) 18:48, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
::Firstly, two of the edits you made had no source at all. Second, as I explained in another edit summary, where on that page does it explicitly say that the trains entered service today? That’s a page advertising that new trains are coming - we know they’re entering service with Chiltern, that’s been in the articles for months. But there’s no mention that today is the first in-service date. Danners430 tweaks made ↗ 18:50, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
:::Look at the pictures I took today then... This is the exact train https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:C90879/2026-01-26/detailed Fortek67 (talk) 18:52, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
::::I’m not in any way doubting the accuracy of the information you’re adding - I’ve seen the pictures too. But Wikipedia does not run on original research ↗, which “I know it to be true” is, or user-generated content ↗ which pictures are - Wikipedia runs on reliable sources. Danners430 tweaks made ↗ 18:54, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
:::::Ok, please now confirm that source I sent of the train departure. If you accept that please undo what you did. Fortek67 (talk) 18:57, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
::::::If you mean RTT, no - it’s bee discussed multiple times at length, and it’s not reliable - see WP:REALTIMETRAINS ↗. Put simply, the data displayed by RTT is only as good as what’s put into TRUST - there are innumerable instances where you’ll see bizarre train formations which cannot ever possibly happen shown on RTT, for no reason other than that’s what was input into the system.
::::::Put simply - what we need is something from a reliable source that says explicitly that the trains have entered passenger service. That may not be available immediately - and that’s fine, there is no deadline ↗. If need be we need to wait until a reliable source is indeed available. Danners430 tweaks made ↗ 19:00, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
:::::Ok, I saw what you said that RealTimeTrains aren't reliable. Could you please find a source then? That's why before I included [citation needed]. I couldn't find an actual source that they are in service today. Please help me with this as soon as possible to keep information reliable and up-to-date. Fortek67 (talk) 18:59, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
::::::Unfortunately that fails WP:BURDEN ↗ - it’s your responsibility as the editor adding content to provide a reliable source. Of course others will help - the problem arises when you add unsourced content to articles… you can of course ask for help via talk pages. Danners430 tweaks made ↗ 19:01, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
::::::So - a quick search on Google is fruitless unfortunately. My guess is that unless Chiltern make an official announcement, it’ll be tomorrow or even a day or two before the Railway Beanos pick up the story and publish something. Unfortunately that’s just how it is sometimes - we’re not a news outlet, we’re an encyclopaedia, so sometimes we just have to wait until a reliable source becomes available ↗. Danners430 tweaks made ↗ 19:04, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
:::::::This is ridiculous. I know that Wikipedia is strict when it comes to sources, but I have already shown you all evidence that this information is correct. I get that I can't use that information as a source, but you know yourself that it's true. Please just mark the information with [citation needed] for editors to soon add reliable information. I don't want other people editing that page with exactly what I did (and not adding a source), since that would waste their and my time, which it has already for me. Fortek67 (talk) 19:08, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
::::::::As I said above - adding content with a Citation Needed tag goes against policy, specifically WP:BURDEN ↗. Unfortunately policies aren’t optional, that’s why they’re called policies. I’ve done some searching and can’t find anything yet - but it won’t take long for a reliable source to materialise. And when it does, we can revert the removals and add the source then.
::::::::My suggestion would be to have a read of WP:TRUTH ↗. Danners430 tweaks made ↗ 19:11, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::How about we at least add the new pictures? Fortek67 (talk) 19:13, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
::::::::::Absolutely no harm in adding pictures whatsoever - as long as we don’t claim that it’s the first day of passenger service without a source. We can easily caption it as {{tq|Chiltern Mk5a set at FooBar Railway Station on the 42nd Febanuary 1945}} (being obvious with my placeholder text because I don’t know where or when the photos are actually from :D) Danners430 tweaks made ↗ 19:17, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::Actually, never mind that. If you look deeper into my original source, ↗ (by opening the "Which services will these trains run on?" FAQ), it says: "Our Chiltern Explorer trains will launch on Monday 26th January on four weekday services between Birmingham Moor Street and London Marylebone. The remaining trains will be introduced at different stages through 2026."
:::::::::Please confirm this source and add it with also my original edits. Fortek67 (talk) 19:16, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
::::::::::That’s a trickier one actually - I personally would still be against it, purely because of WP:CRYSTAL ↗ - that’s their website stating that their plan is to introduce them on day X, not stating that it’s actually happened. It’s a bit here and there though… might be better to get a wider opinion on it - might I suggest raising that specific issue at WT:WikiProject UK Railways ↗? They’re usually quick to respond, and better to get a third opinion as I’m not too sure. Danners430 tweaks made ↗ 19:19, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::::Do I really have to do this? No offence, but you're making this harder and more complicated than it should be. I would get it if the date was a long way away, but come on, I think the reader is smart enough to understand that the trains are in service, with the pictures provided. Fortek67 (talk) 19:24, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
::::::::::::This is standard Wikipedia policy. And it has to be said, this happens every time one of these events take place - when a train has a farewell tour, everyone wants to be the first to change the Wikipedia page to say they’ve been withdrawn… when there is no source to say they actually have. I’m sorry mate, but that is just how Wikipedia works - as an encyclopaedia we’re based on verifiable facts, backed up by reliable sources. And having just spent five minutes scrolling through google, unfortunately those reliable sources simply don’t exist yet.
::::::::::::Honestly - there quite simply is no rush. Give it time - it could be a few hours and something suddenly pops up from Rail Magazine, or it could be an announcement by Chiltern tomorrow. As I said before, there’s no deadline. Danners430 tweaks made ↗ 19:28, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::::::I have started a discussion ↗ like you suggested on the UK Railways WikiProject. Fortek67 (talk) 19:38, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
::Also worth noting - please don’t add galleries like you did on one of the articles, as this violates WP:GALLERY ↗. Galleries have a specific and narrow use on Wikipedia, and shoe-horning extra images into an article is not one of them. Danners430 tweaks made ↗ 18:51, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
:::Ok, sorry I didn't know. I will delete the gallery. Fortek67 (talk) 18:53, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
::::No worries - as much as what I say can sound harsh, I’m not here to be mean or angry - we all start somewhere, and we don’t all know every policy on day one! Danners430 tweaks made ↗ 18:55, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Listing for discussion of :Template:PKP colour ↗

30px|link=|alt= ↗ :Template:PKP colour ↗ has been listed for discussion ↗, which may result in the template being merged ↗ or deleted ↗ by consensus ↗. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at '''the entry on the Templates for discussion page''' ↗. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:49, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Pieńsk railway station ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, Fortek67. This message concerns the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "Pieńsk railway station ↗".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy ↗, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:Pieńsk railway station|edit the submission}}, and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can '''request its undeletion''' ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!  DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:25, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

G15

Hi there! I'm reaching out more personally because you recently nominated a large number of articles for G15 speedy deletion ↗ without explaining why you believed the articles were LLM-generated ''without reasonable human review''. Based on a quick look at these articles, they do not contain communication intended for the user nor are the sources implausible, non-existent, or nonsensical. I've added discussion to each individual page, but I wanted to bring this to your talk page, as well. Nominating a bunch of articles by a single editor is extremely bitey behaviour, especially when it's not clear that the articles meet the speedy deletion criteria. This could be considered disruptive editing. In the future, I recommend nominating a page or two first to see if there's agreement that these articles meet the criteria. If they're deleted, then you can nominate the others. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:31, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

:Follow-up: I saw the discussion over at AI clean up. As an alternative to deletion ↗, I have moved the relevant articles to the draft space. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:59, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
::Hi @Significa liberdade, thank you for your review and drafting of the nominated articles. I am very sorry for being unclear. This was my first time nominating articles for deletion. I did ask my mentor how to do so beforehand; and then confirmed with them after the first nomination to make sure I didn't make any mistakes or forget anything, they said no.
::Now, there are more articles to be cleaned up. How can I do this correctly next time, in a mass like I just did? Also will I have to nominate them specifically to be drafted instead, and if I have to, can I do this with Twinkle? Thanks, Fortek67 (talk) 04:26, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
:::If they're from the same editor, I suggest installing WP:MOVETODRAFT ↗. Then, you can tag the articles as LLM-generated, then move to draft. When you do so, click the box that says the article is AI-generated. You may want to add a dummy edit ↗ or a notice on the talk page linking to the relevant discussion. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:32, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
::::@Significa liberdade, thanks for the script. One question - when you draft these articles, do they work the same way as AfC drafts? As in, do they get automatically deleted after a while of being abandoned (not edited)? Thanks, Fortek67 (talk) 08:30, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
:::::Yup! When the article gets moved to draftspace, it's the same as any other draft. As a note, there are specific guidelines around draftification, so make sure you check out WP:DRAFTIFY ↗ and WP:DRAFTNO ↗. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:45, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
::::::@Significa liberdade, do I need the page mover permission to conduct these drafts? There is still a lot of work to do with cleaning up these articles by Input Zoom... Could I just pass this information onto someone else? Also at least one more article for now, Wałbrzych Główny railway station ↗, needs to be drafted or deleted. Thanks, Fortek67 (talk) 19:15, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
:::::::Hi there! You don't need the page mover abilities to do draftifications. It will just leave behind a cross-namespace redirect, which an admin will come delete (MoveToDraft automatically tags it). That said, I can look through the rest of Input Zoom's contributions for further draftification. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:16, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
::::::::Thank you, @Significa liberdade. Though I think Chaotic Enby has/will soon also go ahead with the draftification. Fortek67 (talk) 21:20, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gozdnica railway station ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sagan ↗ was added. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Fortek67. Thank you for your work on Sędzisław railway station ↗. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Thank you for your work on this article. Please establish notability as per WP:NTRAINSTATION ↗. Thanks and have a good day!}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Mariamnei<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 09:14, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

:Hi {{Re|Mariamnei}} I have added more information to the article, cited by reliable sources. Please take a moment to review my edit ↗, and remove the notice if the article meets the nobility criteria. Thanks, Fortek67 (talk) 09:37, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
::Thank you for your improvements. I am having a little difficulty identifying which sources are secondary and which are from the rail company itself. Nevertheless, I have removed the template because I think it marginally meets notability. However, please fix footnote 3 which currently leads to Google translate. Thanks and have a great day! Mariamnei (talk) 09:51, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
:::{{Re|Mariamnei}} railway companies in Poland and or Polish State Railways ↗ do not publish information and history about the station. All information you can find that is published by them is timetables (which can be seen under the Train services section), station facilities, etc. Thanks for telling me about footnote 3, I did that link on accident, all fixed to correct website now. Fortek67 (talk) 09:56, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
::::Thank you for your improvements. Mariamnei (talk) 09:58, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Fortek67. Thank you for your work on Witków Śląski railway station ↗. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Thank you for your work on this article. Please establish notability as per WP:NTRAINSTATION ↗. Thanks and have a great day!}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Mariamnei<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 09:30, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

:Hi {{Re|Mariamnei}} I have added more information to the article, cited by reliable sources. Please take a moment to review my edit ↗, and remove the notice if the article meets the nobility criteria. Thanks, Fortek67 (talk) 11:01, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
::Thank you for writing to me. I think it marginally meets notability so I have removed the template. I recommend continuing to add more secondary sources if possible. Have a wonderful day! Mariamnei (talk) 11:11, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Ways to improve Turoszów Kopalnia railway station

Hello, Fortek67,

Thank you for creating Turoszów Kopalnia railway station ↗.

I have tagged the page ↗ as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process ↗ and note that:

{{Quote|1=Doesn't meet WP:NGEO ↗ and WP:NTRAINSTATION ↗ more specifically.}}

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with <code><nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>VortexPhantom<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>. Remember to sign your reply with <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse ↗.

Delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer. 

 '''''PhantomVorteX''''' (Talk) 09:21, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

:Hi @VortexPhantom, thank you for reviewing Turoszów Kopalnia railway station ↗ and Turoszów Kopalnia Wąskotorowy railway station ↗. I agree, the articles are very short, but I intended them to be stubs. I am happy to expand both nominated articles to the best I can, for them to meet the notability criteria. Then we can consider voiding the proposed deletion. Thank you, Fortek67 (talk) 14:33, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
::{{Re|VortexPhantom}} I have now expanded both articles, and removed notice templates. Please take a moment to review my edits. 1 ↗ 2 ↗. Thanks, Fortek67 (talk) 18:13, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Turoszów Kopalnia railway station ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Turoszów Kopalnia railway station ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Doesn't meet WP:NGEO ↗ and WP:NTRAINSTATION ↗ more specifically'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

 '''''PhantomVorteX''''' (Talk) 09:21, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Turoszów Kopalnia Wąskotorowy railway station ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Turoszów Kopalnia Wąskotorowy railway station ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Doesn't meet WP:NTRAINSTATION ↗'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

 '''''PhantomVorteX''''' (Talk) 09:22, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

right|80px ↗
Hi Fortek67, I just wanted to let you know that I have added ↗ the autopatrolled user right ↗ to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed ↗. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested ↗ on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers ↗.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject ↗ templates, stub tags ↗, categories ↗, and incoming links ↗ to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies ↗, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller ↗ yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:07, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

:Thank you! Fortek67 (talk) 17:12, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Silesian Railways ↗, links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pesa ↗ and Chałupki ↗ were added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the Cheers message Fortex. It really helps me out, mainly because I made this account a few minutes ago. Thank you and hope you get a bunch of Thanks on Wikipedia! WikiHelperfortheEnglishWorld (talk) 17:19, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

:Thank you, and good luck! Don't hesitate to ask me if you have any questions about Wikipedia :) Fortek67 (talk) 17:31, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
::I can't make pages, not even drafts. The only reason I made this account was to edit the Mexia Supermarket ↗ page, not make a full out page! If you were wondering, I want to make a page about the defunct "Danals Food Store" company. I linked the Mexia Supermarket wiki page so you can take a look and make a page for me. WikiHelperfortheEnglishWorld (talk) 17:34, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
:::@WikiHelperfortheEnglishWorld, you can make drafts, you were probably just doing it wrong. Because you are not autoconfirmed ↗, (an account that has made at least 10 edits, and is 4 days old after their first edit) you will have to submit an AfC (article for creation), which you can do here ↗. I strongly recommend you have a read of Help:Your first article ↗. It is very important for your article to meet the notability ↗ criteria, be in a neutral tone ↗, avoid promotional language ↗, and of course, be supported by reliable ↗ and independent ↗ sources. Hope this helps! Fortek67 (talk) 17:48, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
::::Yea but by that, I meant I am too dumb to make pages, since I'm new. WikiHelperfortheEnglishWorld (talk) 17:49, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::Check back where the Wiki page is linked. Sorry, I understand you might not understand English as much as I do. WikiHelperfortheEnglishWorld (talk) 17:51, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::Oh my bad, I've seen Mexia Supermarket ↗. What exactly do you need help with then? If you want to learn how to write an article, you can have a read of Wikipedia:Writing better articles ↗. Fortek67 (talk) 17:56, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
::::But anywho, thanks for the help, Polish Fortex! WikiHelperfortheEnglishWorld (talk) 17:55, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::i mean Fortek sorry WikiHelperfortheEnglishWorld (talk) 17:55, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::Don't worry I speak English haha Fortek67 (talk) 17:56, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::i know WikiHelperfortheEnglishWorld (talk) 17:58, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::::what was i was trying to say was "OMG THIS EDITOR IS CRAP I DONT WANT TO MAKE A DRAFT NO MORE" WikiHelperfortheEnglishWorld (talk) 17:59, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::::lol WikiHelperfortheEnglishWorld (talk) 17:59, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
:::Actually you can request someone to make an article at Wikipedia:Requested articles ↗. Although there is such a long backlog that I doubt your article would be made. Fortek67 (talk) 18:03, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
::::ehh nvm WikiHelperfortheEnglishWorld (talk) 18:07, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::thanks tho, you're really helpful :) WikiHelperfortheEnglishWorld (talk) 18:07, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::No worries! Fortek67 (talk) 18:20, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::::i think i (or somebody else) needs to make a part of the wiki page just about Danals WikiHelperfortheEnglishWorld (talk) 18:26, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::::by wiki page i mean mexia supermarket WikiHelperfortheEnglishWorld (talk) 18:34, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::i found a video that can be used as a source for mexia supermarket https://youtu.be/zLW_rg4amoA?si=6mynGqUaZQ2LHo97 ↗ WikiHelperfortheEnglishWorld (talk) 18:37, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::::::Writing about Danals in a subsection of Mexia Supermarket ↗ is definitely a much better idea, as Danals may not meet the notability ↗ criteria. Now it does seem that the store receives enough coverage at the Background ↗ section, so I suggest first talking about the addition in the talk page of Mexia Supermarket ↗.
::::::::::Also, YouTube can't be used as a source per WP:RSPYT ↗. You will have to find something else although what you sent seems to already be cited with other sources. Fortek67 (talk) 18:49, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::::k i used the youtube video in a cite so i removed it brb im going to recommend if i add that to the mexia supermarket page in the talk page WikiHelperfortheEnglishWorld (talk) 18:56, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::::::::i '''''JUST''''' realized that you didn't send me a message as soon as I made my account, Wikipedia does that automatically so I met you because of a few bits of '''CODE????''' WikiHelperfortheEnglishWorld (talk) 19:02, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::::::No. I sent it to you myself. Some other language Wikipedias do it automatically with a bot. Fortek67 (talk) 19:03, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::::::::::oh WikiHelperfortheEnglishWorld (talk) 19:05, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::::::::turns out that the talk page hasn't been touched in a year
:::::::::::::::?? WikiHelperfortheEnglishWorld (talk) 19:09, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::::::::::::THE WIKI PAGE FOR NOTHING WAS SO VANDALISED THAT WIKIPEDIA ADMINS HAD TO LOCK EDITS (i just found out about this) WikiHelperfortheEnglishWorld (talk) 19:14, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::::::::::::Editors who have the article on their Watchlist ↗ will notice your message. If nobody does after a while, consider notifying the relevant WikiProjects (displayed at the top of the talk page) such as WikiProject Texas ↗. Fortek67 (talk) 20:23, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::::::::::::Also I've said before ↗ to not change other people's discussions even if it's your talk page. See WP:TALKO ↗. You are allowed to have your own message at the top of your talk page however, it should just be separate from anyone else's :) Fortek67 (talk) 20:25, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::::::::::? WikiHelperfortheEnglishWorld (talk) 20:29, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::::::::::::::Oh sorry. What was the specified comment you were talking about? WikiHelperfortheEnglishWorld (talk) 20:34, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::::::::::::Oh sorry, I thought that comment was automatically placed onto my Talk page. I'll bring it back. DW ;) WikiHelperfortheEnglishWorld (talk) 20:42, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::::some people used content from youtube, should I find reliable sources for the youtube cites and remove the cited sentences? also the wikiproject in relation to the page is inactive sadly so i cant cotact them sorry for the bad grammer this was a quick reponse to a past message of yours :P WikiHelperfortheEnglishWorld (talk) 02:13, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::::::::I found a r/ page that is... idk what to say about it. It's r/HalfLife3 ↗, obviously about the unreleased Half Life game from the series, it has some weird content, usually derived from TikTok, images maybe from memes or analog horror, and videos, yea. You're going to be as confused as I am. WikiHelperfortheEnglishWorld (talk) 02:43, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::::::doesn't need to be looked at
:::::::::::::lol WikiHelperfortheEnglishWorld (talk) 02:48, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::::::''Half Life 3'' seems to have already been covered at ''Half-Life 3 ↗''. Once again, you can't use social media as a source. See WP:SPS ↗, WP:RSSELF ↗, WP:UGC ↗, and specifically WP:RSREDDIT ↗. Fortek67 (talk) 12:16, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::::::::::I know. I just wanted to let you know, sorry it was late at night, I was sleeping. IK you have a different timezone :) - Love, WikiHelperfortheEnglishWorld (talk) 23:08, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::::::::::Sorry i thought you meant the r/ page, not the game itself. But thanks for the heads-up! WikiHelperfortheEnglishWorld (talk) 03:03, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::::::::If you've seen citations to YouTube as a source on Wikipedia, they may count as a reliable source ↗ per WP:RSPYT ↗: {{tq|uploaded from a verified official account, such as that of a news organization, may be treated as originating from the uploader and therefore inheriting their level of reliability.}} However, that doesn't mean that the YouTube video you previously sent is a reliable source, because the creator seems to be an independent YouTuber. Remember, {{tq|YouTube is generally unreliable}}.
::::::::::::And honestly, if nobody seems to reply to your message, you can try adding more information about Danals store in the Background section of Mexia Supermarket ↗. Now remember it is very important to write in a constructive ↗ tone, and a neutral point of view ↗. I can see that you didn't before for one of your edits and as a result they were reverted by another editor ↗. Fortek67 (talk) 12:12, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::::::Yes, it was about "most recognized". I thought there was more than one Mexia shop, sorry. I'm pretty young but I understand. - Love, WikiHelperfortheEnglishWorld (talk) 23:07, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Question from Nicholasfromtarponsprings (01:33, 1 June 2026)

Do I have to know html to make an article? --Nicholasfromtarponsprings (talk) 01:33, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

:Nicholasfromtarponsprings, no, you do not need to know HTML to write an article. Instead, Wikipedia uses wikitext ↗. Although many HTML tags can be used in Wikitext ↗, they usually have an alternative to them, such as the {{Template|Center}} template for <code><nowiki><center></nowiki></code>. See a comparison of wikitext and HTML here ↗, hope this helps. Fortek67 (talk) 15:09, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Question from Gatluak Wan Jalduong Weng on Help:List of tutorials and introductions ↗ (14:58, 3 June 2026)

How can I add articles --Gatluak Wan Jalduong Weng (talk) 14:58, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

:Click on "edit" at the top of the article. If the article is protected, you will have to submit an edit request ↗. Fortek67 (talk) 15:01, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

'''Question from Gatluak Wan Jalduong Weng on Help:List of tutorials and introductions ↗ (14:59, 3 June 2026)'''
{{aitop}}
Gatluak Wan Jalduong Weng

Gatluak Wan Jalduong Weng (born 9 July 1996) is a South Sudanese public servant, accountant, administrator, community leader, and advocate for peace, good governance, and sustainable development. He is recognized for his contributions to public administration, financial management, information technology, community leadership, youth empowerment, and institutional development in South Sudan.

Born in Nasir County, Upper Nile State, South Sudan, Gatluak developed a strong passion for leadership, public service, and community development from an early age. He completed his basic education at the Presbyterian Church of Sudan School in Khartoum in 2017 and his secondary education at Future English Academic School in 2020. He later pursued studies in Accounting Information Systems at the Middle East College of Technology in Khartoum, Sudan, where he acquired knowledge in accounting, finance, information systems, and organizational management.

Throughout his career, Gatluak has served in several government and community leadership positions. He worked as Senior Bookkeeper in the Department of Administration and Finance at the Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation of the Republic of South Sudan, where he contributed to financial administration, record management, accountability, and institutional efficiency. In 2023, he served as Inspector of Information Technology in the Office of the Deputy Governor of Lakes State, supporting information management systems and administrative operations. In 2024, he served as Private Secretary to the Deputy Governor of Lakes State, providing executive support, administrative coordination, stakeholder engagement, and management of official affairs.

Beyond government service, Gatluak has played an active role in community leadership and civic engagement. He has served as Secretary General of the Wang Family Association, Secretary General of the Nasir Students Association, and Coordinator General of the South --Gatluak Wan Jalduong Weng (talk) 14:59, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
{{aibottom}}
:What exactly do you need help with? This seems to be text generated by AI (an LLM ↗), which is not permitted on Wikipedia. Fortek67 (talk) 15:03, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
::No, that's my biography and I Want Wikipedia to use them whenever someone asks about me. Gatluak Wan Jalduong Weng (talk) 15:07, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

'''Please add my biography.'''
{{aitop}}
'''Gatluak Wan Jalduong Weng''' (born 9 July 1996) is a South Sudanese public servant, accountant, administrator, community leader, and advocate for peace, good governance, and sustainable development. He is recognized for his contributions to public administration, financial management, information technology, community leadership, youth empowerment, and institutional development in South Sudan.

Born in Nasir County, Upper Nile State, South Sudan, Gatluak developed a strong passion for leadership, public service, and community development from an early age. He completed his basic education at the Presbyterian Church of Sudan School in Khartoum in 2017 and his secondary education at Future English Academic School in 2020. He later pursued studies in Accounting Information Systems at the Middle East College of Technology in Khartoum, Sudan, where he acquired knowledge in accounting, finance, information systems, and organizational management.

Throughout his career, Gatluak has served in several government and community leadership positions. He worked as '''Senior Bookkeeper''' in the Department of Administration and Finance at the Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation of the Republic of South Sudan, where he contributed to financial administration, record management, accountability, and institutional efficiency. In 2023, he served as '''Inspector of Information Technology''' in the Office of the Deputy Governor of Lakes State, supporting information management systems and administrative operations. In 2024, he served as '''Private Secretary to the Deputy Governor of Lakes State''', providing executive support, administrative coordination, stakeholder engagement, and management of official affairs.

Beyond government service, Gatluak has played an active role in community leadership and civic engagement. He has served as '''Secretary General of the Wang Family Association''', '''Secretary General of the Nasir Students Association''', and '''Coordinator General of the South Sudanese Chiefs Council'''. Through these positions, he has promoted education, youth participation, community development, social cohesion, cultural understanding, and peaceful conflict resolution.

Gatluak has received professional training in Computer Applications, Information Technology, Public Speaking, Crisis Management, Conflict Resolution and Negotiation, Strategic Planning, Entrepreneurship and Business Management, Leadership Development, and Administrative Management. He also possesses knowledge of '''Cybersecurity and Information Security Awareness''', with an interest in promoting the safe and responsible use of digital technologies and the protection of organizational information and systems.

His professional competencies include Public Administration, Financial Management and Bookkeeping, Information Technology Management, Cybersecurity Awareness, Strategic Planning, Leadership and Team Management, Communication and Public Relations, Negotiation, Conflict Resolution, Community Mobilization, Organizational Development, and Entrepreneurship.

As a public servant and community leader, Gatluak is committed to advancing peace, security, education, accountable governance, and sustainable development in South Sudan. He believes that strong institutions, responsible leadership, and active citizen participation are essential foundations for national progress and prosperity.

Gatluak Wan Jalduong Weng speaks '''Nuer''' as his mother tongue and is also fluent in '''English''' and '''Arabic'''.

'''Vision'''
Gatluak envisions a peaceful, united, and prosperous South Sudan where every citizen has access to quality education, economic opportunities, effective public services, and equal participation in nation-building.

'''Personal Motto'''
''"Leadership is not defined by authority alone, but by service, integrity, and the positive impact one creates in the lives of others and the community."''

'''Gatluak Wan Jalduong Weng'''

Public Servant | Accountant | Administrator | Community Leader | Peace and Development Advocate Gatluak Wan Jalduong Weng (talk) 15:04, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
{{aibottom}}

:Unfortunately, I can't write an article for you. You can submit an article at Wikipedia:Articles for creation ↗. See Help:Your first article ↗. Please do not write an article with the text you sent above, as it is generated by an LLM ↗ (large language model), which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
:Also, Wikipedia strongly discourages autobiographies (articles about yourslef). Please read Wikipedia:Autobiographies ↗. Fortek67 (talk) 15:08, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Question from Skyzess (16:33, 3 June 2026)

Hey Fortek67,
I would like to know whether or not edits should be made using information only a number of professionals studying the information, or that edits must only be made with information all/nearly all professionals ascribe to. If not, should it be stated the facts about a certain thing are still debated? --Skyzess (talk) 16:33, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

:Skyzess, as long as the text is support by a reliable source ↗, it should be fine. Per WP:WEIGHT ↗, {{tq|Neutrality requires that mainspace articles and pages fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in those sources.}} – articles should be written in a neutral point of view ↗, you should cover all views. See also WP:FRINGE ↗, maybe that will answer your question better? Fortek67 (talk) 16:44, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

right|80px ↗
Hi Fortek67, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right ↗ to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation ↗ tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed ↗. If you asked for this at requests for permissions ↗, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol ↗. Before you get started, please take the time to:

Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers ↗ to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions

If you use Twinkle ↗, configure it ↗ to log your CSDs and PRODs

If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies ↗

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources ↗. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! signed, '''''Rosguill''''' ''talk'' 22:57, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

G14

CSD G14 ↗ is not for any unnecessary disambiguation pages. It is only for disambiguation pages with zero bluelinks, and pages wth one bluelink that end with "(disambiguation)". –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄ ↗) 09:26, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

:Sorry I didn't know, it just seems like the disambiguation page is a bit useless. Fortek67 (talk) 09:27, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

STOP SPAMMING

{{archivetop}}
Where exactly is AI being used on the tournament pages???????? What were you basing that on? What did you expect to see on the tournament page? Or on the athletes' pages?— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by Sporwiki (talk • contribs ↗) 17:51, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
:Please keep the discussion at WP:AIN#User:Sporwiki ↗. To answer your question, it's impossible to humanly create 71 articles in one day just minutes apart. It's clear you are using an LLM. Also, please stop reverting the notices I add, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Fortek67 (talk) 17:55, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
{{archivebottom}}

LLMPROD on Black Council (novel) ↗

Hi Fortek67, I noticed you prodded Black Council (novel) ↗, which is quite long. The majority of the article (the plot) was written by a different editor who nominated it for DYK, and as far as I can tell, they have not had issues with AI edits. WP:LLMPROD ↗ states that you should {{tq|make sure the creator is its only significant contributor}}, so in this case, PROD would not be suitable. In the future, please check the history to ensure there are no other significant contributors. Thanks! ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 06:19, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

:Hi ARandomName123. The article was created by a user who creates articles with an LLM, hence why the article was PROD'd. The edit summary specifically says to revert the PROD if another user improves the article, so no issue here. Fortek67 (talk) 07:03, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
::My point is, the article shouldn't have been PROD'd in the first place, as LLMPROD only applies to articles where the AI editor is the primary contributor. In this article, another editor also made significant contributions, so LLMPROD should not have been applied. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 00:09, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

Listing for discussion of :Template:WikiProject Poland topicon ↗

30px|alt=icon ↗ :Template:WikiProject Poland topicon ↗ has been listed for discussion ↗, which may result in the template being merged ↗ or deleted ↗ by consensus ↗. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at '''the entry on the Templates for discussion page''' ↗. Gonnym (talk) 08:15, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Check semi-automated edits

Hi, I noticed {{diff2|1359514864|this edit}}, which I assume was semi-automated (find and replace). Just a quick note to check if the replacements are appropriate or if further updates are needed. In this case, you left the text "Silesian Railways (Silesian Railways)" in the article (which I've corrected). Cheers, Suriname0 (talk) 20:21, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

:Hi Suriname0, thanks for the correction. Yes, the edits are semi-automated off a very basic AWB find and replace script. I very briefly checked all 200 or so edits every time, correcting any mistakes such as the file name being replaced. Obviously I didn't notice this one, so thank you for the correction. Fortek67 (talk) 20:25, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
::Makes sense, thanks for the reply. I do think it's a good update, so thanks for doing it. Suriname0 (talk) 20:31, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
:Oh yeah and the replacement you made is indeed correct. Fortek67 (talk) 20:26, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Some guidance needed

Hello, sorry to trouble you.

I was going through article edits which have suspected AI-generated ↗ content in them and tracked down an edit made by a currently active user. I'm not too sure whether to notify the editor on their talk pages first, maybe settle it one-to-one or to bring the case directly through WP:AIN ↗. PeepeeDino (talk) 11:59, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

:No worries PeepeeDino, thanks for asking. Honestly it depends. If it's only a few edits, let's say around 30 or less (there is no official number) then honestly don't bother posting on AIN. You should instead post {{t|Uw-ai1}} (<code><nowiki>{{subst:Uw-ai1}}</nowiki></code>) on their talk page and revert all AI-generated edits. Now, if said user also created numerous AI-generated articles, then you should bring it up to AIN. If the user continues to make AI-generated edits then you can also bring it up to AIN, albeit you escalate the warnings to {{t|uw-ai2}}, {{t|uw-ai3}}, etc. Hope this helps. Fortek67 (talk) 15:05, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
::Ah, noted then.
::It's just that whenever I do try and confront someone with such a substantial claim (using LLM ↗s in this case) I do get a little iffy on whether my judgement is correct or not. But I mean, that AI tag alone already gives them those presumptions I guess.
::Thanks Fortek67! Also appreciate the works you've done for WP:AIC ↗. PeepeeDino (talk) 15:41, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
:::Thank you, PeepeeDino. Let me know if you have any more questions or need help with AI removal. Fortek67 (talk) 16:39, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Question from Akshay Ajitj (05:31, 17 June 2026)

I have created a draft article in my sandbox about Akshay Ajith with references from Cinema Express, The New Indian Express, Deccan Chronicle, Mathrubhumi and Asianet News.
Could you please review the draft and advise whether it is ready for Articles for Creation submission?
Thank you. --Akshay Ajitj (talk) 05:31, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

:Hi Akshay Ajitj. If you are writing the biography about yourself, autobiographies are strongly discouraged ↗. The draft itself also seems more like an advertisement ↗ about you, for example, having four different external links (WP:ELMIN ↗). The only that should be linked here is the official website. It's good that you've cited reliable sources, however I'm not so sure if the article would meet the notability criteria. BLPs also have much stricter rules for citations. For instance, you didn't cite a source for {{tq|Akshay Ajith was born in Chavakkad, Thrissur district, Kerala, India.}} Also, by any chance, did you use AI to create the article? The use of AI is prohibited on Wikipedia ↗. For example, refs 1 and 2 are duplicates, and the same film is shown twice under the Filmography section. Fortek67 (talk) 15:35, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

Request for reviewing my articles that i made about railway lines in Poland

I saw you reviewed both of my articles about railway lines in Poland, which were Nowy Świętów–Sławniowice Nyskie railway ↗ and Nysa–Kałków Łąka railway ↗. I made 3 more articles which needs to be reviewed, and these are

- Otmuchów–Dziewiętlice railway ↗

- Nysa–Ścinawa Mała railway ↗

- Nowy Świętów–Głuchołazy railway ↗

Could you please review the 3 articles that i made? They might be ready for the review as they contain useful information if i am not wrong. Also thank you for reviewing both of my articles. 120Hz USB type C HDMI cable cord (talk) 19:50, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

:Hi 120Hz USB type C HDMI cable cord, thank you so much for your contributions to Poland rail-related articles. I've reviewed all three articles, and made some fixes. I've also left you feedback, so see your talk page. Now, I can tell that you probably cited sources with the automatic tool. I recommend to not use this tool and instead cite the sources manually, because automatic citations usually output mistakes. For example, I had to fix all citations to Ogólnopolska Baza Kolejowa ↗ because the URL led to a 404 page (I have experienced this issue myself when I've used the automatic cite tool). I would also avoid referring to structures such as "Railway bridge in LOCATION" – also this may be a direct translation from Polish, it makes more sense to refer to the structure as "LOCATION railway bridge" (example ↗).
:P.S. since you are interested in rail transport in Poland, you may be interested in this discussion ↗. I would greatly appreciate it as I'm looking to start a task force related to the topic, so we could improve the current articles and increase coverage of the topic. Thank you. Fortek67 (talk) 20:40, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Bedford Rail Crash

Hi, about the edit you were discussing on my talk page.

On the BBC article linked throughout the page (see here, https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cy8dy2pr8ymt), there are photos with both unit numbers clearly displayed. Would this be enough to count as a citation in and of itself or would a text-based version be required?

Cheers MajorScafellPike (talk) 19:28, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

:Hi MajorScafellPike. I really do appreciate your edits, however photos are considered original research ↗. You would have to wait for a reliable source ↗ to publish the train unit numbers in text, so you would have to wait – there is no rush ↗. Now this is currently being addressed in Talk:2026 Bedford train collision#Trains involved ↗, so nonetheless the edit would have been unfortunately reverted. I hope you understand. Thank you. Fortek67 (talk) 19:31, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

Recent RM closure

Hello,

Would you mind giving a reason for your recent closure of the Talk:Philadelphia metropolitan area#Requested move 28 May 2026 ↗ discussion, or adding a summary on the page itself? This would be very helpful. Thank you. Red0ctober22 (talk) 21:14, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

:Red0ctober22, thanks for asking, I've added a reason to the RM ↗. I appreciate all your efforts to rename the title, but now honestly man, you likely won't get support if you don't actually prove that Greater Philadelphia is the WP:COMMONNAME ↗. Now at the same time, I'm not from Philadelphia, and Greater Philadelphia may be the common name, however, looking at what the participants said, it clearly isn't, although don't get me wrong, it's still a widely used name. Hopefully I make sense of what I just said. Fortek67 (talk) 22:49, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
::I understand. Looking back I probably should not have opened a whole new discussion. In the first discussion, I did present NGrams comparisons and results from a comparison of the 3 names that I did on Newspapers.com, but it got such low engagement that I tried a more specific discussion with a target page in mind.
::I felt that there could still be potential for the discussion to develop, but the main problem was that the discussion started to deviate toward people debating whether or not "Delaware Valley" was a suitable name, which is exactly what I didn't want to happen. Red0ctober22 (talk) 22:57, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

RM re-closure on Talk:Flamingo Revolution ↗

Greetings. The rationale for your closure at Talk:Flamingo Revolution ↗ was just WP:COMMONNAME ↗. May you please further expand your closure rationale there after all a move review and then a relist? Thanks. George Ho (talk) 17:16, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

:No worries, I've expanded the reason. Fortek67 (talk) 21:11, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Page mover granted

right|80px ↗
Hello, Fortek67. Your account has been granted ↗ the "{{mono|extendedmover}}" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages ↗. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect ↗ and move subpages ↗ when moving the parent page(s).

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover ↗ for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect ↗. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures ↗ and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when <code>suppressredirect</code> is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere ↗. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password ↗. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked ↗.

Useful links:

Wikipedia:Requested moves ↗

:Category:Requested moves ↗, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! TonyBallioni (talk) 13:15, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

June 2026

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hi Fortek67! I noticed that you recently made an edit at :Portal:Current events/2026 June 25 ↗ and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit ↗" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typo ↗s or reverting obvious vandalism ↗. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you.  signed, '''''Pat''''' ''talk'' 04:49, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

:Apologies for that, I was editing this topic very quickly and didn't mean to mark it as a minor edit, which then I couldn't change it back. Fortek67 (talk) 13:22, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Upcoming expiry of your patroller right

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot ↗ to let you know that your permission "patroller" (New page reviewers) will expire on 00:00, 3 July 2026 (UTC). For most rights, you will need to renew at WP:PERM ↗, unless you have been told otherwise when your right was approved. {{grey|To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion ↗.}} Leaderbot (talk) 19:41, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Macaca fascicularis ↗

When an RM is for A → B, you need to explain better why you moved the article to C. I count 8 participants in that RM and only 4 in favour of C, i.e., not a majority. Srnec (talk) 20:39, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

:Your closing statement is incorrect. Srnec (talk) 17:02, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
:Because that's what the majority supported. To break it down:
:* 1 supported the move in general
:* 4 supported the move to Macaca fascicularis
:* 2 opposed the move to Macaca fascicularis
:And it looks to me that the rest of the discussion was debating if Macaca fascicularis is the WP:COMMONNAME ↗... Fortek67 (talk) 19:10, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

::The nom favoured Long-tailed macaque, as did BhagyaMani and Randy Kryn. I was also explicit as preferring it to ''Macaca fascicularis''. That's four in favour of the proposal over the name chosen. 4 out of 8 participants (can't disregard the nom) is not a majority. Srnec (talk) 19:36, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
:::I get your frustration, and thanks for bringing this up. I admit these last couple weeks I've been quite stupid with closing such discussions. Now it has been closed, so I don't really know what to do from here. If you're really unhappy about the result, then you may request a move review. Sorry. Fortek67 (talk) 19:55, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

The DCWC is open!

thumb|upright=1.2|See a {{nowrap|{{legend inline|ffb219}} "developing"}} or {{nowrap|{{legend inline|ff562f}} "least}} developed" country? Write about it to earn points! ↗

Hey Fortek67, the third annual Developing Countries WikiContest ↗ is now '''open for submissions'''. Welcome to the contest! You can now list your work at '''your submissions page''' ↗ to earn points ↗. We hope that you enjoy participating in this drive to fight Wikipedia's systemic bias ↗. If you haven't done so already, please review the following:

New to Wikipedia? Many experienced editors are part of this contest and willing to help; feel free to ask questions on the talk page ↗.

Got open nominations? List them at the review requests sidebar ↗.

Looking for a topic to work on? Check out suggested articles ↗ and eligible reviews ↗.

Not sure if your article qualifies? See the scoring rules ↗ for more information or contact a coordinator ↗.

Know someone else who might be interested? Sign-ups remain open ↗ throughout the contest, so don't hesitate to invite other editors!

On behalf of the coordinators, we hope you enjoy participating and wish you the best of luck! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page ↗ or ask one of the coordinators: {{noping2|Arconning}}, {{noping2|Generalissima}}, {{noping2|Magentic Manifestations}}, {{noping2|sawyer777}}, or {{noping2|TechnoSquirrel69}}. (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list ↗. Sent via MediaWiki message delivery.) —'''TechnoSquirrel69''' ('''talk''') 00:00, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
{{clear|right}}

Question from Apophenia 1 (09:31, 1 July 2026)

Hello Fortek, how do i check if my account is autoconfirmed? --Apophenia 1 (talk) 09:31, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

:Apophenia 1, I can see your account is autoconfirmed. You may see WP:AUTOCONFIRMED ↗. If you're on desktop, it should say on the right whether or not you are autoconfirmed. Fortek67 (talk) 15:05, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
::Thank you for the help. Apophenia 1 (talk) 20:14, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

Question from Dynozos (21:51, 2 July 2026)

Is it alright if I try and make my own Wikipedia article on a Youtuber called Temprist? --Dynozos (talk) 21:51, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

:If you're talking about the Roblox YouTuber, no. Doing some research about him and he doesn't seem to be notable for Wikipedia ↗. There also seem to be no reliable sources ↗ mentioning him. Fortek67 (talk) 21:59, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

Lioness line consensus

Since you have done the other three line consensuses, and its been 7 days since a Lioness line split talk has been made, will you be able to give a consensus for this one?

Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Watford_DC_line#Splitting_proposal:_Split_out_a_new_Lioness_line_article Faisalisonline2 (talk) 19:49, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

:Oh yeah, sorry for not replying. At the moment I'm quite unsure, the consensus is quite split. Would rather leave it to another editor or give it a few more days before it can be closed. And at the moment I don't really want to close any more of these discussions considering that some other editors have gotten angry at me for doing something wrong. Fortek67 (talk) 19:53, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
::I'd say give it 48 more hours. If nothing changes and the majority of people say they want to split then you can split and vice versa. The main reason people were angry was because you ended it too early. So use the advice I have used and if the same people argue, you can tell them I gave themthe advice. Faisalisonline2 (talk) 20:05, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
:::Looks like Pretzel Quetzal has added a further comment for the consideration of doing an RM instead. Fortek67 (talk) 20:23, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
::::That has less of a chance of moving ahead due to many operators sharing the same piece of track Faisalisonline2 (talk) 20:28, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
::::I think it might be time for a consensus now Faisalisonline2 (talk) 19:30, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::I'm sorry, maybe ask another editor. Fortek67 (talk) 21:25, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

Question from Oumar 3333 on Tough love ↗ (10:29, 8 July 2026)

Salam modi --Oumar 3333 (talk) 10:29, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

:Alaikum salam Not exactly sure what language that is, but you may want to see Wikipedia:List of Wikipedias ↗ for other language Wikipedias. Fortek67 (talk) 15:52, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

On the review about the "China Shock 2.0"

@Fortek67 Hi there, I'm the creator of the page China Shock 2.0 ↗ that you rated some days ago. I noticed that you classified that topic as "low importance" both in China and Trade general topics... shouldn't it at least be of "medium" importance? The fact that China is invading Europe with its electric cars, tech and other things is a current question frequently discussed in politics. XD LucaLindholm (talk) 09:54, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

:Thank you for your contributions, LucaLindholm. I assessed the article using an automatic tool named Rater ↗. If you disagree with the importance you may change it. Fortek67 (talk) 14:22, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
::@Fortek67 No problem. ;)
::I will leave it unchanged, others will have to decide. Have a nice day. LucaLindholm (talk) 14:24, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

Can you help me find more information about this station?

Hi, we chatted on my talk page a few days ago :) I was wondering if you could maybe help me find more information/sources for the station Warszawa Główna Wąskotorowa, a former narrow-gauge railway station in Warsaw. Here's a link to a stub on the Polish Wikipedia, with almost zero sources: Warszawa Główna Wąskotorowa ↗. I'm writing article on the neighbourhood it was in, and I wanted to mention it in it, but I lack any sources or any information like when it was built and demolished or who used it. Of course, I understand if you are busy, or if narrow-gauge railways are not your expertise, but I wanted to try anyway :) Cheers, sincerely, Artemis Andromeda (talk) 00:57, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

:Wow, this one is strange, probably the least documented former railway station I've ever seen. I've seen Lower Silesian railway stations in the middle of nowhere documented better than this!
:Baza Kolejowa ↗ says that the station (I'll refer to it as WGW) opened in 1909 and closed sometime in 1920. This is according to the, page on the railway line, it also says WGW lied on the Warszawa Mokotów–Warszawa Główna Wąskotorowa railway ↗. Which means that WGW was a terminus ↗, and the only other station on the line was Warszawa Mokotów ↗. It looks like the line served some military airport ↗? Sidings branched off to it, but I assume you know something about the airport. Anyways, there's a whole gallery of pictures on the line ↗, with captions, maybe you'll recognise some of the them. And I'm still rather sceptical about the line's opening or closure, this picture ↗ was taken in 1901 "shortly after the line was built". This undated newspaper ↗ documents the lines closure and dismantle, but we don't know when that happened (Baza Kolejowa dates the newspaper "before 1935"). At least we know the line was ''actually'' dismantled, not stolen by people or destroyed during the war.
:What I definitely know and can confirm is that this station was very short-lived. And lied somewhere near or probably adjacent to Warszawa Główna ↗, hence the name, serving as a small station. You see this with other stations, e.g. Bogatynia Wąskotorowa ↗ (near Bogatynia ↗). Also, such narrow-gauge stations are more comparable to modern tram stops, this one also ran on roads, probably used single-carriage railcars. Narrow-gauge lines are just usually heavier, and they could carry freight ↗. The gauge was also 1000m wide if that is any useful information. Hope this helps. Fortek67 (talk) 15:20, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
::Hi, thank you very much for writing back. Yeah, same for me, I never saw station this undocumented. It's not even listed on atlaskolejowy.net ↗ and it seems to list even the minor glorified tram stops of narrow-guague railways. It had me even wondering if that station even existed. About the airport, yes, that's the Mokotów Aerodrome, it was actually mostly a civilian airport, but it also housed an airforce base. I looked around a bit, and I was able to find another article on Polish Wikipedia mention it, thought not by name. The article for Wilanów Railway ↗, says "W 1894 roku zbudowano odcinek między Rogatką Belwederską a Mokotowską (Plac Unii Lubelskiej, wówczas Keksholmski), a w 1900 roku połączono go dalej z dworcem towarowym Kolei Warszawsko-Wiedeńskiej dla uruchomienia na kolei ruchu towarowego". We can probably assume it's talking about WGW. Honestly, this launches me into another search on what was this cargo station. Does it just mean the cargo area at Vienna Station or something near it? Anyway, yeah, the line definitely extended there. It also establishes it was created in 1900. Warszawa Mokotów was closed down in 1935 and moved to a different location futher south, eventually being permanently closed down in 1938, which could also suggest that WGW was also closed arouns then, though, I don't wanna claim it for certain. Also, I wanted to ask you, do you think you would have any books or know where to look, to find any proper sources to quote in the article, and maybe find sold dares or even the adress? It's ofcourse completely find if you don't, or don't wanna, just asking just in case:) Artemis Andromeda (talk) 02:36, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers ↗ to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions

If you use Twinkle ↗, configure it ↗ to log your CSDs and PRODs

If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies ↗

Roger Hedden

Thanks for your comments and prompting about the new page for Roger Hedden ↗. I've added a couple of references. It's a curious situation: his films are extremely well known (with top-talent actors) and well covered, including here on WP, however personal information about him is scarce. All the more important, in my view, to create a page here to collect information on him in one place. Saparagus (talk) 20:55, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

:You'll still have to add more sources, especially that the career section has no sources. Maybe try going on sites that mention those films and citing them if they confirm he had something to do with said film (like a director, idk myself). Otherwise you fail to prove that Hedden meet the notability ↗ criteria. And sadly, you can't site those current two sources per WP:IMDB ↗ and WP:WORDPRESS ↗ – as harsh as I may sound they are unreliable sources ↗. Fortek67 (talk) 21:31, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

You're invited to the Mentorship noticeboard

Hi, Fortek67. You are cordially invited to the brand new Wikipedia:Mentorship noticeboard ↗. I get the impression sometimes that we mentors are each toiling in our own cubbyhole, quietly answering mentee questions with little to no interaction with other mentors. I think we have a lot to share and learn from each other, and I know it will make me feel better just having the opportunity to interact with you and other mentors there, and I hope it will for you, too. Looking forward to hearing your feedback. Please take the {{slink|WP:MNB|Survey|nopage=yes}} when you get there! Mathglot (talk) 03:08, 11 July 2026 (UTC)