W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Lisha2037

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.


Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Ritu Khullar ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Ritu Khullar ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />

The article has been assessed as '''Stub-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop ↗ over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.

<div class="autoconfirmed-show">Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation ↗ if you prefer.</div>

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''<span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Ritu_Khullar help desk]</span>'''.<span class="unconfirmed-show"> Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request to Articles for creation ↗.</span>

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}.

Thanks again, and happy editing!
Jamiebuba (talk) 22:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC talk-->

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Nicholas Devlin ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Nicholas Devlin ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />

The article has been assessed as '''Start-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop ↗ over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.

<div class="autoconfirmed-show">Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation ↗ if you prefer.</div>

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''<span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Nicholas_Devlin help desk]</span>'''.<span class="unconfirmed-show"> Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request to Articles for creation ↗.</span>

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}.

Thanks again, and happy editing!
~Liance<sup>talk</sup> 01:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC talk-->

Kathleen Roussel ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Kathleen Roussel ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it has no sources''' and '''it needs more sources to establish notability'''.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. <span style=white-space:nowrap;><span style="background-color:#e0f7fa;padding:2px 5px;border-radius:5px;font-family:Arial black"><span style=color:#00c>C</span> <span style=color:red>F</span> <span style=color:#5ac18e>A</span></span> <span style="background-color:#e6e6fa;padding:2px 5px;border-radius:5px;font-family:Arial black">💬</span></span> 21:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Ritu Khullar ↗


Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Ritu Khullar/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Ritu Khullar ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose</small> -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 14:21, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Ritu Khullar ↗


The article Ritu Khullar ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has been placed on hold 20px|link= ↗. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria ↗, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ritu Khullar ↗ and Talk:Ritu Khullar/GA1 ↗&nbsp;for issues which need to be addressed. <!-- Template:GANotice result=hold --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose</small> -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 10:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Ritu Khullar ↗


The article Ritu Khullar ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Ritu Khullar ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Ritu Khullar/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose</small> -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 08:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Susanne Craig



Hi Lisha, I saw you renominated -- I'm going to remove your renomination but just for a half an hour or an hour then it'll go back up. It's to avoid confusing the bot that maintains the GA pages -- Reidgreg is going to put in the fail and I don't want the bot to get confused about there being two simultaneous nominations. Don't worry about the nomination apparently disappearing -- it'll come right back. Mike Christie (talk ↗ - contribs ↗ - library) 21:40, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

:Ok wasn’t sure what was happening as the other editor won’t be able to pick it up unless there’s a nomination. Lisha2037 (talk) 21:42, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
::There will be another nomination -- shouldn't be long as Reidgreg said they're working on the text of the fail they'll post. Mike Christie (talk ↗ - contribs ↗ - library) 21:44, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
:::Now renominated. It should show up in the GA nominations page in about twenty minutes. Mike Christie (talk ↗ - contribs ↗ - library) 22:28, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
::::@Thebiguglyalien I think it’s now ready. Lisha2037 (talk) 22:39, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Susanne Craig ↗


Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Susanne Craig/GA2{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Susanne Craig ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien</small> -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:23, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

:Thanks a lot. Also, If there’s a certain editing style you prefer let me know. I definitely want this article to be made green! :) Lisha2037 (talk) 01:24, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red


Hi there, Lisha2037, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to have a dynamic Canadian journalist interested in improving our coverage of women. Given your GA success with Ritu Khullar ↗ and your nomination of Susanne Craig ↗, not to mention all the improvements you have made to several other biographies of women, it certainly looks as if you will be a useful member of the project. I realize you are already a highly competent editor but when writing about women you might find it useful to look through our Primer ↗. You might also like to sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members ↗ where others will be able to see your interest in the project. As you have been working on improving articles up to GA, you might like to take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Green ↗. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:26, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red October 2024



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFFFFF;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|100px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320</small>
<br />

'''Online events:'''


'''Announcements from other communities'''

'''Tip of the month:'''

'''Other ways to participate:'''
frameless|15px ↗ Instagram ↗ '''|'''
frameless|15px ↗ Pinterest ↗ '''|'''
frameless|15px ↗ Twitter/X ↗
|}--Ipigott (talk) 09:26, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Susanne Craig ↗


The article Susanne Craig ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has been placed on hold 20px|link= ↗. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria ↗, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Susanne Craig ↗ and Talk:Susanne Craig/GA2 ↗&nbsp;for issues which need to be addressed. <!-- Template:GANotice result=hold --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien</small> -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 22:25, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Susanne Craig ↗


The article Susanne Craig ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Susanne Craig ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Susanne Craig/GA2 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien</small> -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:21, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red November 2024



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFFFFF;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|100px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323</small>
<br />

'''Online events:'''


'''Announcements from other communities'''

'''Tip of the month:'''

'''Other ways to participate:'''
frameless|15px ↗ Instagram ↗ '''|'''
frameless|15px ↗ Pinterest ↗ '''|'''
frameless|15px ↗ Twitter/X ↗
|}
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:Lajmmoore@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/G-N&oldid=1254095864 -->

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/05&oldid=1258243594 -->

DYK for Susanne Craig


{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On 26 November 2024 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''Susanne Craig ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that '''Susanne Craig ↗''' won the Pulitzer Prize for Explanatory Reporting ↗ for her reporting on Donald Trump's taxes after receiving a copy of his tax records in her mailbox?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Susanne Craig ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(here's how, Susanne Craig ↗)</small>, and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page ↗.
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> RoySmith (talk) ↗ 00:03, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red December 2024



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFFFFF;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|100px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325 </small>
<br />

'''Online events:'''


'''Announcements from other communities'''

'''Tip of the month:'''

'''Other ways to participate:'''
frameless|15px ↗ Instagram ↗ '''|'''
frameless|15px ↗ Pinterest ↗ '''|'''
frameless|15px ↗ Twitter/X ↗
|}
--Lajmmoore (talk 18:45, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:Lajmmoore@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/G-N&oldid=1258737489 -->

Nomination of :Sanjay Kumar Verma ↗ for deletion


<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Sanjay Kumar Verma ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjay Kumar Verma&#32; (2nd nomination) ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> &#8213;<span style="background:#ececec;color:#005475;font-size:0.9em;">'''''"Ghost of Dan Gurney"'''''</span> <sub><span style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS';font-size=3em">(hihi)</span> ↗</sub> 11:24, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

:Hi…umm I never put it forward for review as it was still a draft in progress. Not sure what is happening here but it’s definitely not ready. Lisha2037 (talk) 22:01, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
::Another user repeatedly moved the article into mainspace from draft. As it's a contested draftification, it now requires a consensus at AfD to return or else I'd have been continuing the move war. Not your fault at all and this message was given to you automatically by the script that I used to nominate at AfD. &#8213;<span style="background:#ececec;color:#005475;font-size:0.9em;">'''''"Ghost of Dan Gurney"'''''</span> <sub><span style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS';font-size=3em">(hihi)</span> ↗</sub> 22:49, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red January 2025



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFFFFF;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | frameless|center|300px ↗ right|100px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>January 2025, Vol 11, Issue 1, Nos 324, 326, 327, 328, 329 </small>
<br />
'''Online events:'''

'''Announcements from other communities'''

'''Tip of the month:'''

'''Other ways to participate:'''
frameless|15px ↗ Instagram ↗ '''|'''
frameless|15px ↗ Pinterest ↗ '''|'''
frameless|15px ↗ Twitter/X ↗
|}
--Lajmmoore (talk 17:50, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:Lajmmoore@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/G-N&oldid=1263556351 -->

Concern regarding Draft:Paula Scanlan ↗


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Lisha2037. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Paula Scanlan ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again&#32;or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Draft:J.J. McCullough


Hello! I found your page after looking up Riley Gaines ↗. I like the work you've contributed to Canadians, especially Susanne Craig. I'm looking to improve the draft about Canadian political commentator and youtuber Draft:J.J. McCullough ↗. It's been rejected a few times. When I asked for feedback from editors, I was told they would not offer feedback because the subject was too political. Hope you might be interested in giving it a read.

Also, if you're interested in female lawyers, you may be interested in this other page I wrote a fair bit on, Usha Vance ↗. - Count3D (talk) 03:10, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

:Hey! Thank for reaching out. I made some minor edits. I skimmed through the article and from what I can tell I think the notability comment left by editors has mostly to do with the fact a lot of the sources are either not secondary or they are not reliable. I would recommend checking some of the against Wikipedia source list where they rank if a source is generally considered reliable or not. Since he is a political figure and to some extent controversial, you have to be extra cautious about using sources that would either be biased or just mention him in passing.
:My comment on the writing itself would be to structure it more on his YouTube presence and how that has influence other people. Ask yourself why he deserves a Wikipedia page when there are several cooking pages on YouTube with much higher subscriber and view count. If you can’t demonstrate his impact, I doubt the editors will be willing to pass it. If you use Riley as an example, her article highlights how her activism has garnered both attention and created momentum through her presence.
:I hope this helps. Lisha2037 (talk) 08:05, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
::Very helpful, thank you for the input! Will revisit this page with that perspective in mind. Count3D (talk) 06:24, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Women in Red February 2025



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFFFFF;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|100px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>February 2025, Vol 11, Issue 2, Nos. 326, 327, 330, 331 </small>
<br />
'''Online events:'''

'''Announcements from other communities:'''

'''Tip of the month:'''

'''Suggestion:'''

'''Other ways to participate:'''
frameless|15px ↗ Instagram ↗ '''|'''
frameless|15px ↗ Pinterest ↗ '''|'''
frameless|15px ↗ Twitter/X ↗
|}
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:55, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:Lajmmoore@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/G-N&oldid=1271905541 -->

Your draft article, Draft:Paula Scanlan ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, Lisha2037. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "Paula Scanlan ↗".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace ↗, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:Paula Scanlan|edit the submission}} and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! <!-- Template:Db-draft-notice --> DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 22:24, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Women in Red March 2025



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFFFFF;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|100px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>March 2025, Vol 11, Issue 3, Nos. 326, 327, 332, 333, 334 </small>
<br />
'''Online events:'''

'''Announcements from other communities:'''

'''Tip of the month:'''

'''Moving the needle:'''<ref>{{cite web |title=Humaniki |url=https://humaniki.wmcloud.org/search}}</ref>
Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,669 articles during this period!

'''Other ways to participate:'''
frameless|15px ↗ Instagram ↗ '''|'''
frameless|15px ↗ Pinterest ↗ '''|'''
frameless|15px ↗ Twitter/X ↗
|}
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:55, 25 February 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:Lajmmoore@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/G-N&oldid=1275712017 -->

{{reftalk}}

Concern regarding Draft:George Dolhai ↗


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Lisha2037. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:George Dolhai ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again&#32;or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Women in Red April 2025



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFFFFF;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|100px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>April 2025, Vol 11, Issue 4, Nos. 326, 327, 335, 336</small>
<br />
'''Online events:'''

'''Announcements (Events facilitated by others):'''

'''Tip of the month:'''

'''Moving the needle:''' (statistics available via Humaniki tool ↗)

Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 2,657 articles during this period!

'''Other ways to participate:'''
frameless|15px ↗ Instagram ↗ '''|'''
frameless|15px ↗ Pinterest ↗
|}
--Rosiestep (talk) 13:19, 30 March 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:Rosiestep@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/G-N&oldid=1282916439 -->

Your draft article, Draft:George Dolhai ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, Lisha2037. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "George Dolhai ↗".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Db-draft-deleted --><!-- Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 08:24, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Snow White controversy



For what it's worth, I'm on your side when it comes to the addition of the Snow White Controversy to Rachel Zelger's page. Also, I think you have reason to accuse your detractor of bias. For one thing, he described the controversy surrounding Rachel Zegler's comments as "undeserved." What does that have to do with anything? Do we now remove all any and all controversy surrounding public figures based on what they "deserve"? And even if we did, by what objective measure does he use to determine what Rachel Zegler "deserves"? That whole use of the term "undeserved" effectively disqualifies him from making any changes to that page.

And as I also pointed out, Peter Dinklage's comments regarding the Snow White movie made it to his own Wikipedia entry, and unlike Rachel Zegler, he wasn't even in the movie. SanctimoniousPharisee (talk) 11:28, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

:It’s probably Zegler fans wanting to protect her. Most celebrities have their controversies posted on their pages. Hers should be there because it clearly had not only a huge on impact on the film but has been covered by numerous notable sources which is what Wikipedia needs for it to be considered worthy of being added to one’s page. We can go around making it balanced such as adding that Pedro pascal defended her, but yeah it needs to be there. Lisha2037 (talk) 14:34, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Women in Red May 2025



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|100px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>May 2025, Vol 11, Issue 5, Nos. 326, 327, 337, 338</small>
<br />
'''Online events:'''

'''Announcements''' (events facilitated by others):

'''Progress''' ("moving the needle"):
:* 21 Apr 2025: 20.090% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,061,363; 414,126 women)
:* 24 Mar 2025: 20.070% (2,057,083 bios; 412,857 women)

'''Tip of the month:'''

'''Other ways to participate:'''
|}
--Lajmmoore (talk 09:20, 29 April 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:Lajmmoore@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/G-N&oldid=1287335422 -->

Women in Red June 2025



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|100px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>June 2025, Vol 11, Issue 6, Nos. 326, 327, 339, 340</small>
<br />
'''Online events:'''

'''Announcements''':

'''Progress''' ("moving the needle"):
:* 19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280; 415,618 women)
:* 21 Apr 2025: 20.090% (2,061,363 bios; 414,126 women)

'''Tip of the month:'''

'''Other ways to participate:'''
|}
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:04, 29 May 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:Lajmmoore@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/G-N&oldid=1292366845 -->

The World Destubathon ↗


Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon ↗. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It started today on Monday June 16 and will run until Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible!♦ <span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#aba67e">''Dr. Blofeld''</span> 17:53, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Women in Red July 2025



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|100px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>July 2025, Vol 11, Issue 7, Nos. 326, 327, 341, 342, 343</small>
<br />
'''Online events:'''

'''Announcements''':

'''Progress''' ("moving the needle"):
:* 19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280 bios; 415,618 women)
:* 23 Jun 2025: 20.130% (2,072,236 bios; 417,132 women)

'''Tip of the month:'''

'''Other ways to participate:'''
|}
--Lajmmoore (talk 09:20, 30 June 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:Lajmmoore@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/G-N&oldid=1297796253 -->

Women in Red August 2025



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|100px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>August 2025, Vol 11, Issue 8, Nos. 326, 327, 344, 345, 346</small>
<br />
'''Online events:'''

'''Announcements''':
<!--
'''Progress''' ("moving the needle"):
:* 19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280 bios; 415,618 women)
:* 23 Jun 2025: 20.130% (2,072,236 bios; 417,132 women
-->
'''Tip of the month:'''

'''Other ways to participate:'''
|} --Rosiestep (talk) 14:50, 30 July 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:Rosiestep@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/G-N&oldid=1301711670 -->

Women in Red September 2025



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|100px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>September 2025, Vol 11, Issue 9, Nos. 326, 327, 347, 348, 349<br>''Recognized as the most active, topic-based WikiProject by human changes ↗.''</small>
<br />
'''Online events:'''

'''Announcements''':

'''Tip of the Month''':

'''Progress''' ("moving the needle"):

'''Other ways to participate:'''
|}
--Rosiestep (talk) 23:54, 31 August 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:Rosiestep@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/G-N&oldid=1308594643 -->

Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" |right|100px ↗ '''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10, Nos. 326, 327, 350, 351, 352<br>''Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes ↗.''</small>
<br />
'''Online events:'''

'''Announcements''':

'''Tip of the Month''':

'''Progress''' ("moving the needle"):
Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool ↗; currently, QLever.<br>Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 6,283 articles during this period:

'''Other ways to participate:'''
|}
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:30, 29 September 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:Rosiestep@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/G-N&oldid=1311141120 -->

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Robert Crawley (fictional character) ↗ (October 3)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by SafariScribe was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources ↗. ''Reliable'' sources are required so that information can be verified ↗. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners ↗ and Citing sources ↗.|}}<!--
--
-->&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=Seeing more of a TV series sources.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

<span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">Safari Scribe</span><sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Edits!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 05:20, 3 October 2025 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo ↗
| <div style="background-color:#e1e6db; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello, '''Lisha2037'''!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the '''Articles for creation help desk ↗'''. If you have any ''other'' questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the '''Teahouse ↗''', a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">Safari Scribe</span><sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Edits!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 05:20, 3 October 2025 (UTC)</div>
|}<!-- Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation -->
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC ↗

Women in Red - November 2025



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" |right|100px ↗ '''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>November 2025, Vol 11, Issue 11, Nos. 326, 327, 353, 354</small>
<small>''Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes ↗.''</small>
<br /><br />
'''Online events:'''

'''Announcements''':

'''Tip of the Month''':

'''Progress''' ("moving the needle"):
:* 21 Oct 2024, 19.963% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,030,245 biographies; 405,305 women)
:* 28 Oct 2025: 20.23% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,094,677 biographies; 423,778 women)

'''Other ways to participate:'''
|}
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:06, 30 October 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:Rosiestep@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/G-N&oldid=1316525476 -->

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/05&oldid=1322758768 -->

Women in Red - December 2025



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" |right|100px ↗ '''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>November 2025, Vol 11, Issue 12, Nos. 326, 327, 355, 356, 357</small>
<small>''Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes ↗.''</small>
<br /><br />
'''Online events:'''

'''Announcements''':

'''Tip of the Month''':
<!--
'''Progress''' ("moving the needle"):
:* 21 Oct 2024, 19.963% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,030,245 biographies; 405,305 women)
:* 28 Oct 2025: 20.23% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,094,677 biographies; 423,778 women)
-->

'''Other ways to participate:'''
|}
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:18, 28 November 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:Rosiestep@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/G-N&oldid=1324088109 -->

Women in Red - January 2026



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | frameless|center|300px ↗ right|100px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>January 2026, Vol 12, Issue 1, Nos 357, 358, 359, 360 </small>
<br />
'''Online events:'''

'''Announcements from other communities'''

'''Tip of the month:'''

'''Other ways to participate:'''
frameless|15px ↗ Instagram ↗ '''|'''
frameless|15px ↗ Pinterest ↗
|} --Rosiestep (talk) 23:32, 26 December 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:Rosiestep@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/E-L&oldid=1329590645 -->

Women in Red February 2026



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|100px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>February 2026, Vol 12, Issue 2, Nos 358, 359, 361, 362, 363 </small>
<br />
'''Online events:'''

'''Announcements from other communities'''

'''Tip of the month:'''

'''Other ways to participate:'''
frameless|15px ↗ Instagram ↗ '''|'''
frameless|15px ↗ Pinterest ↗
|}
--Lajmmoore (talk 22:48, 31 January 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:Lajmmoore@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/E-L&oldid=1335810919 -->

FA review of Rule of inference ↗



Hello {{u|Lisha2037}} and thanks for your GA review of the article Ontology ↗ a while back. I was wondering whether you may be interested in reviewing the article Rule of inference ↗ at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Rule of inference/archive1 ↗. I've nominated it for FA status, but it hasn't received enough reviews so far. Thank you for taking a look and please feel under no obligation if now is not a good time. Phlsph7 (talk) 11:20, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

:Lots of exams this week but I can try this weekend! Lisha2037 (talk) 04:48, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
::Great, I'm looking forward to your comments. Phlsph7 (talk) 09:47, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red - March 2026



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|75px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>March 2026, Vol 12, Issue 3, Nos 358, 359, 364, 365, 366 </small>
<br />
'''Online events:'''

'''Announcements from other communities:'''

'''Tip of the month:'''

'''Other ways to participate:'''
frameless|15px ↗ Instagram ↗ '''|'''
frameless|15px ↗ Pinterest ↗
|} --Rosiestep (talk) 09:28, 25 February 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:Rosiestep@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/E-L&oldid=1339441115 -->

Concern regarding Draft:Robert Crawley (fictional character) ↗


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Lisha2037. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Robert Crawley (fictional character) ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again&#32;or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:08, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red – April 2026



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|75px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>April 2026, Vol 12, Issue 4, Nos 358, 359, 367, 368, 369</small>
<br />
'''Online events:'''

'''Announcements from other communities:'''

'''Tip of the month:'''

'''Other ways to participate:'''
frameless|15px ↗ Instagram ↗ '''|'''
frameless|15px ↗ Pinterest ↗
|}
--Chocmilk03 (talk) 20:15, 29 March 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:Chocmilk03@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/E-L&oldid=1345367814 -->

Women in Red – May 2026



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|75px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>May 2026, Vol 12, Issue 5, Nos 358, 359, 370, 371, 372</small>
<br />
'''Online events:'''

'''Announcements from other communities:'''

'''Tip of the month:'''

'''Other ways to participate:'''
frameless|15px ↗ Instagram ↗ '''|'''
frameless|15px ↗ Pinterest ↗
|}
--Chocmilk03 (talk 04:45, 30 April 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:Chocmilk03@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/E-L&oldid=1347866657 -->

Disambiguation link notification for May 5



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Burns Lake ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Russell Brown ↗ was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:Russel Brown SCC portrait.jpeg


32px|left ↗
Thanks for uploading ''':File:Russel Brown SCC portrait.jpeg ↗'''. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use ↗. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion ↗. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have ''no free equivalent''; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

# Go to the file description page ↗ and add the text {{Tlx|Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|&lt;your reason>}} '''below''' the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <code>&lt;your reason></code> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
# On the file's talk page ↗, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license ↗, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on <span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Special:Contributions|target=Lisha2037&namespace=6}} this link]</span>. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy ↗. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page ↗. Thank you. <!-- Template:di-replaceable non-free use-notice --> Whpq (talk) 21:14, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red - June 2026



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|75px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>June 2026, Vol 12, Issue 6, Nos 358, 359, 373, 374, 375</small>
<br />
'''Online events:'''
{{hidden|Announcements, tips, participation...|
'''Announcements from other communities:'''

'''Tip of the month:'''

'''Other ways to participate:'''
|} --Rosiestep (talk) 22:51, 25 May 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:Rosiestep@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/E-L&oldid=1354822499 -->

July 2026



<section begin="July" />
{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|75px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>July 2026, Vol 12, Issue 7, Nos 358, 359, 376, 377</small>
'''Events:'''

{{hidden|Announcements, tips, participation...|
'''Announcements from other communities:'''
|frameless|100px|right ↗

'''Tip of the month:'''

'''Other ways to participate:'''
|}<section end="July" />

--MSGJ (talk 22:14, 28 June 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:MSGJ@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/E-L&oldid=1358220945 -->