User Talk: Volcanoguy

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

<div class="infobox" style="width: 315px">
<div style="text-align: center">50px|Archive ↗ 
'''Archives''' ↗
</div>
----
# December 16, 2006 - May 12, 2008
# May 6, 2008 - November 8, 2008
# November 12, 2008 - March 23, 2009
# March 24, 2009 - May 5, 2010
# May 4, 2010 - February 21, 2011
# February 21, 2011 - September 28, 2014
# October 1, 2014 - July 26, 2021
# May 22, 2021 - June 16, 2024
----
<div class="center">'''This page will be archived when I feel like it. If you cannot find what you are looking for, check the most recent archive.'''</div>
</div>

Your GA ↗ nomination of Sheep Track Member ↗

The article Sheep Track Member ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Sheep Track Member ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Sheep Track Member/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 16:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Mount Edziza ↗

The article Mount Edziza ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Mount Edziza ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Mount Edziza/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 16:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

TFA

{{User QAIbox
| image = Hawthorn in bloom, Ehrenbach.jpg
| image_upright = 0.8
| bold = story · music · places
}}
Thank you for many recent quality articles, and today especially for Mount Edziza volcanic complex ↗, "about a group of volcanoes in British Columbia, Canada. It includes Mount Edziza, one of the highest volcanoes in Canada. The volcanic complex has been an area of volcanic activity for at least 7.4 million years, most recently in the last 2,000 years. It is also the most active volcanic system in Canada, having erupted more than 29 times during the Holocene. It also remains as one of the best-studied volcanic centres in northwestern British Columbia."! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Editor experience invitation

Hi Volcanoguy :) I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 22:23, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cerro Panizos/archive1

Greetings,
since you took part in the review at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Mount Hudson/archive1 ↗ I was wondering if you had any thoughts on Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cerro Panizos/archive1 ↗, especially the disagreement between me and David Fuchs. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:26, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

:Maybe if you would have helped me promote the Volcanism of the Mount Edziza volcanic complex ↗ article to FA but I didn't get any support from you so I'll hold my thoughts. Don't expect help from me if you're not going to help me as well. '''Volcanoguy''' 15:22, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
::Yeah, sorry about not giving a full review to that one, I must have forgotten it. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 06:22, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
:::I might renominate it in a few weeks and when I do I will ping the users who were involved in the last FAC. Currently working on a draft for the Big Raven Plateau ↗ article in my sandbox. '''Volcanoguy''' 22:06, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Jo-Jo Eumerus}} Let me know if you need any help with the current FAC. I'm not sure if my support in the previous FAC for Cerro Panizos ↗ counts? '''Volcanoguy''' 20:17, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
::::Dunno about how it works vis-a-vis FAC procedure; {{@FAC}}? That said, I plan to bring Socompa ↗ to FAC next if that helps. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 05:59, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
:::::{{ping|Jo-Jo Eumerus}} Just letting you know that I've nominated Mount Edziza ↗ for FA. '''Volcanoguy''' 19:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Volcano Group ↗

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Volcanoguy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Volcano Group ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

{{-}}

Your draft article, Draft:Volcano Group ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, Volcanoguy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "Volcano Group ↗".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  '''''L'''''iz '''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!''''' 22:10, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

:{{ping|Liz}} Not my draft; take a look through the edit history. '''Volcanoguy''' 22:17, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Promotion of Volcanism of the Mount Edziza volcanic complex ↗

Your GA ↗ nomination of Nahta Cone ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Nahta Cone/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Nahta Cone ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dora the Axe-plorer -- Dora the Axe-plorer (talk) 13:23, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your comment at the tectonic plate lowercasing RM, now relisted

Thanks, and the RM at the talk page of Eurasian Plate ↗ was relisted on the 15th, so not much time left. Logic and commonsense would keep the uppercasing on the 90+ plates under discussion, but lowercasers are using the casing guideline, which some of us have countered with WP:IAR ↗ and WP:COMMONSENSE ↗ which is under fairly intense discussion. If you agree with this approach, or even have more comments, your additional participation may be useful. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:24, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

:{{ping|Randy Kryn}} I've added two more comments in the RM discussion. '''Volcanoguy''' 17:30, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
::Hi, and good points. With such an asked-for major change in how the encyclopedia cases the largest named objects on Earth, properly uppercased since the early 2000's (and uppercased by other encyclopedia's, such as ''Britannica''), it seems the discussion would include many more people. Thanks for all your comments at the page. Randy Kryn (talk) 23:22, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Nahta Cone ↗

The article Nahta Cone ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Nahta Cone ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Nahta Cone/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dora the Axe-plorer -- Dora the Axe-plorer (talk) 23:25, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

:{{ping|Dora the Axe-plorer}} Thanks for reviewing Nahta Cone ↗. You're welcome to review any of my GANs anytime. '''Volcanoguy''' 00:15, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
::Great work on this one. Pleasure to work with you. I'm actually in need of reviewers for my oldest nominations '''''Dora the Axe-plorer''''' (explore) 07:33, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Category:Border Ranges ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

A tag has been placed on :Category:Border Ranges ↗ indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category ↗, a category redirect ↗, under discussion at Categories for discussion ↗, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and removing the speedy deletion tag.   '''''L'''''iz '''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!''''' 20:56, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of :Subaqueous volcano ↗ for deletion

<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Subaqueous volcano ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subaqueous volcano ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.</div> Clone commando sev (talk) 23:49, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

</div>
</div>

Volcanism of the Mount Edziza volcanic complex ↗ scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article ↗ for January 2025. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 2025 ↗, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/January 2025 ↗. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be left there by user:JennyOz ↗, who assists the coordinators by reviewing the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors ↗ from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! SchroCat (talk) 11:21, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
:Thanks for your tweak to the blurb. Unfortunately it knocks it up to 1040 characters, when the max is 1025. Is there anything you can trim to bring it down by at least 15 characters? Cheers. - SchroCat (talk) 17:32, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
::{{ping|SchroCat}} I did another tweak but I'm not sure if it brought the text below 1025. '''Volcanoguy''' 17:43, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
:::Perfect: it’s at 1023. Thanks. - SchroCat (talk) 17:53, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge eighth anniversary

</noinclude>{| style="border: 2px solid gray; background-color: #FFFFF0; vertical-align: middle;"
|rowspan="2" | 100px ↗
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" |'''The Gold Maple Leaf Award'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | This maple leaf is awarded to '''Volcanoguy''' for writing and expanding numerous '''Canadian geography''' articles of the highest quality during the eighth year of The 10,000 Challenge ↗ of WikiProject Canada ↗. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 17:41, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
|}

Your GA ↗ nomination of Tennena Cone ↗

The article Tennena Cone ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has been placed on hold 20px|link= ↗. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria ↗, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tennena Cone ↗ and Talk:Tennena Cone/GA1 ↗ for issues which need to be addressed.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Crisco 1492 -- Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:23, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Tennena Cone ↗

The article Tennena Cone ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Tennena Cone ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Tennena Cone/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Crisco 1492 -- Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:43, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Promotion of Mount Edziza ↗

Your GA ↗ nomination of Spectrum Range ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Spectrum Range/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Spectrum Range ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 17:45, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Spectrum Range ↗

The article Spectrum Range ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has been placed on hold 20px|link= ↗. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria ↗, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Spectrum Range ↗ and Talk:Spectrum Range/GA1 ↗ for issues which need to be addressed.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 19:03, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Spectrum Range ↗

The article Spectrum Range ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Spectrum Range ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Spectrum Range/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 20:06, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

TFA

{{User QAIbox
| image = Ehrenbach icicles.jpg
| image_upright = 1.1
| bold = story · music · places
}}
Thank you today for Volcanism of the Mount Edziza volcanic complex ↗, "about volcanism of a volcanic complex in British Columbia, Canada, that has been erupting episodically for at least the last 7.4 million years. I'm renominating it for FA because there was no consensus for promotion in the last FAC, not to mention there were incomplete reviews. As I've explained in the previous FAC, the reason this article cites Souther a lot is because he's the only geologist to have studied the Mount Edziza volcanic complex in detail, not because the article isn't well-researched which is 1c of the featured article criteria. Most volcanoes in Canada are not well-studied due to their remote locations; Canada also doesn't have a lot of volcanologists."! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:07, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Today, pictured on the Main page ↗, Tosca ↗, in memory of her first appearance on stage OTD in 1900, and of principal author Brian Boulton. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:49, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

:I have nothing to with Tosca ↗. '''Volcanoguy''' 19:09, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
:: I didn't say "thank you". What I meant was "please" look ;) - I was rather proud of bringing her to the Main page. I listened to a broadcast of it, timed for the same anniversary. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:35, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 19 § Natural disasters by year ↗

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization ↗ guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 19 § Natural disasters by year ↗''' on the categories for discussion ↗ page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 19:26, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Cocoa Crater ↗

The article Cocoa Crater ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has been placed on hold 20px|link= ↗. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria ↗, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Cocoa Crater ↗ and Talk:Cocoa Crater/GA1 ↗ for issues which need to be addressed.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Crisco 1492 -- Crisco 1492 (talk) 21:01, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Cocoa Crater ↗

The article Cocoa Crater ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Cocoa Crater ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Cocoa Crater/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Crisco 1492 -- Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:23, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Kitsu Plateau ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Kitsu Plateau/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Kitsu Plateau ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kimikel -- Kimikel (talk) 04:22, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Kitsu Plateau ↗

The article Kitsu Plateau ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Kitsu Plateau ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Kitsu Plateau/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kimikel -- Kimikel (talk) 00:22, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Coffee Crater ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Coffee Crater/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Coffee Crater ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pi.1415926535 -- Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:01, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Promotion of Tennena Cone ↗

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 February 5 § Category:Eponymous categories ↗

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization ↗ guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 February 5 § Category:Eponymous categories ↗''' on the categories for discussion ↗ page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄ ↗) 08:21, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Coffee Crater ↗

The article Coffee Crater ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Coffee Crater ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Coffee Crater/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pi.1415926535 -- Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:43, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Creek versus River?

Hi, Volcanoguy. Your recent edits to both categories (e.g. :Category:Creeks of the Sierra Nevada (United States) ↗) and articles (e.g., Oak Creek Canyon ↗) appear to be making a distinction between creeks and rivers. Are you going purely by the name? I don't think there is any well-established technical distinction between the two types of flowing water bodies. Because of this, I'm unsure that "Creek"ness is a defining characteristic ↗ of these objects: would a creek almost always be referred to as a "creek" in reliable sources (outside the name), or would they also use "stream" or "river"? Something to consider. — hike395 (talk) 17:15, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

:Per stream ↗: "In Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States, a (narrow) stream that is smaller than a river; a minor tributary of a river; a brook." '''Volcanoguy''' 17:17, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
::That is the dictionary definition of creek, yes. But to create a category structure for creeks (versus streams or rivers), it needs to be a defining characteristic ↗ of the topic, see also WP:NONDEF ↗ and WP:DEFINING ↗. Because the distinction between creeks and rivers is blurry, using it as the basis of categorization is questionable. — hike395 (talk) 17:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
:That claim is backed by 5 sources in the article. '''Volcanoguy''' 17:24, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
::I'm not sure which claim you're referring to? I'm not disputing the dictionary definition. I'm trying to figure out whether "creek"ness is a defining characteristic of these kind of streams. — hike395 (talk) 17:26, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
:::I did find this discussion from 2016 ↗: before 2016, there were separate categories for "streams" and "rivers", and the consensus was to combine them. The discussion did consider the distinction between "streams" and "rivers". — hike395 (talk) 17:38, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
:::And here is a discussion from 2015 ↗ on a similar topic, that has links back to even older discussions in 2008 and 2011 at WT:WikiProject Rivers ↗.
:::Given that this was discussed (albeit a long time ago), I think it would be worthwhile to bring it up again, perhaps at WT:WikiProject Rivers ↗? — hike395 (talk) 17:48, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
::::I wasn't aware of those discussions. I've always found it strange how creeks are categorized with rivers since they don't exactly mean the same thing. '''Volcanoguy''' 17:49, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
:::::I don't think it's unreasonable: imo, it's in the "grey zone" where it might be ok. But I suspect we need some centralized discussion. Would you like to start a discussion at WT:WikiProject Rivers ↗? Or should I? — hike395 (talk) 18:02, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
::::::You can start the discussion at WT:WikiProject Rivers ↗ if you like. I should have started a discussion about this before I started creating categories for creeks, but without knowing about the previous discussions I didn't think it was a big deal. '''Volcanoguy''' 18:11, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
:::::::Upon reflection, I think it would be better to bring it up at CfD, because if people do want to merge it, we would have to go through the discussion twice. I'll figure out how to do a mass CfD and then notify WikiProject Rivers. — hike395 (talk) 01:38, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
::::::::If the creek categories were to be merged into the river categories I think there should be a discussion about whether or not the river categories should be renamed. ''Watercourse'' would be a great alternative to avoid the issue of brooks, creeks and streams not being rivers. It also avoids the English variant issue. :Category:Watercourses ↗ already exists as the parent category of :Category:Water streams ↗, which is a parent category of :Category:Rivers ↗ among others. '''Volcanoguy''' 02:12, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::OK. I think we need to workshop this a bit: I'll post something to WT:WikiProject Rivers ↗ and we'll see if we can get consensus about (a) whether to merge and (b) if so, what to merge it to. — hike395 (talk) 11:14, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
{{od|9}} The discussion at WT:RIVERS ↗ has died down a bit, and it appears that
:There's a clear consensus against "creek" categories, and
:There isn't (yet?) a clear consensus of what we should name the merged categories.
I have a suggestion: how about if I mark the "creeks" category discussion as a SNOW close ↗ and we revert your "creeks" splits of the "rivers" categories? If you would like, I can help with AWB.

It looks like the majority of editors want the "river" categories to be named something else, but it looks evenly split between "watercourses" and "rivers and streams". Perhaps we can go to CfD with one of them to get a wider view? or maybe you or someone else has a better idea of how to break the deadlock? — hike395 (talk) 05:39, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

:{{ping|hike395}} I've reverted all of my "creeks" splits of the "rivers" categories so you can SNOW close the discussion at WT:WikiProject Rivers. CfD sounds fine with me. '''Volcanoguy''' 23:15, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of The Pyramid (British Columbia) ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:The Pyramid (British Columbia)/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article The Pyramid (British Columbia) ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of GN22 -- GN22 (talk) 16:44, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of The Pyramid (British Columbia) ↗

The article The Pyramid (British Columbia) ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has failed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:The Pyramid (British Columbia) ↗ for reasons why Talk:The Pyramid (British Columbia)/GA1{{!}}the nomination ↗ failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of GN22 -- GN22 (talk) 17:46, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

:{{ping|GN22}} Thanks for the review! I wonder why ChristieBot claims the GAN failed when it was a pass. '''Volcanoguy''' 20:15, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Promotion of Tseax Cone ↗

Your GA ↗ nomination of Nanook Dome ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Nanook Dome/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Nanook Dome ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of GGOTCC -- GGOTCC (talk) 23:27, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Nanook Dome ↗

The article Nanook Dome ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Nanook Dome ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Nanook Dome/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of GGOTCC -- GGOTCC (talk) 23:22, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

Changing "geologic" to "geological": why?

On Judy Fierstein ↗, Wes Hildreth ↗, and Frank C. Calkins ↗, you changed all instances of "geologic mapping" to "geological mapping". Is there a reason for these changes? BhamBoi (talk) 21:34, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

:Geological map ↗ was moved from geologic map ↗ in accordance to WP:COMMONNAME ↗. '''Volcanoguy''' 21:40, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Oxford Clay vs Oxford Clay Formation

Hi I'm just curious why you recategorized everything at :Category:Oxford Clay Formation ↗ as :Category:Oxford Clay ↗. There is no article of Oxford Clay ↗ while there is one of Oxford Clay Formation ↗, so I would think the most natural category name would match, but maybe there's other logic behind it. '''IJReid''' {<nowiki />{T - C ↗ - D ↗ - R ↗}<nowiki />} 02:57, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

:I didn't recategorize everything into :Category:Oxford Clay ↗; most of what is in that category was already there. Oxford Clay ↗ and Oxford Clay Formation ↗ seem to be the same thing so we don't need two categories for the same topic. I went with :Category:Oxford Clay ↗ because that's the current article title. '''Volcanoguy''' 03:08, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
::Okay sounds good I think I missed what the current article title is. '''IJReid''' {<nowiki />{T - C ↗ - D ↗ - R ↗}<nowiki />} 07:03, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

The World Destubathon ↗

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is $3338 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to help you buy books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for volcanoes or anything which interests you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested.♦ ''Dr. Blofeld'' 11:29, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

:I'm not sure if I will be destubing or improving longer stale articles between now and July 13 so I will probably not participate in this World Destubathon. '''Volcanoguy''' 16:02, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Eve Cone ↗

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Eve Cone/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing ↗ the article Eve Cone ↗ you nominated for GA ↗-status according to the criteria ↗. 20px|link= ↗ This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 21:44, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Eve Cone ↗

The article Eve Cone ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has been placed on hold 20px|link= ↗. The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria ↗. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Eve Cone ↗ and Talk:Eve Cone/GA1 ↗ for issues which need to be addressed.   Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 22:07, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Your GA ↗ nomination of Eve Cone ↗

The article Eve Cone ↗ you nominated as a good article ↗ has passed 20px|link= ↗; see Talk:Eve Cone ↗ for comments about the article, and Talk:Eve Cone/GA1 ↗ for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 00:24, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Big Raven Plateau ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Big Raven Plateau ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See Talk:Big Raven Plateau/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MediaKyle -- MediaKyle (talk) 16:43, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Big Raven Plateau ↗ has passed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Big Raven Plateau ↗ has 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''passed'''; congratulations! See Talk:Big Raven Plateau/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MediaKyle -- MediaKyle (talk) 10:42, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Promotion of Eve Cone ↗

Tintina Fault ↗

Hello Volcanoguy,
You may be interested to read a recent paper https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025GL116050 regarding the Tintina Fault in Canada, which I noticed you created the page for back in 2009. - Indefensible (talk) 06:10, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

:Thanks, but II don't really work on fault articles. I only created the Tintina Fault article because that fault borders the Northern Cordilleran Volcanic Province. '''Volcanoguy''' 13:43, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
::Yeah but volcanoes and faults often seem connected from my non-expert view. Anyway no worries, just thought you might be interested by the update on this subject. - Indefensible (talk) 17:49, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Exile Hill ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Exile Hill ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See Talk:Exile Hill/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JackFromWisconsin -- JackFromWisconsin (talk) 23:28, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Exile Hill ↗ has passed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Exile Hill ↗ has 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''passed'''; congratulations! See Talk:Exile Hill/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JackFromWisconsin -- JackFromWisconsin (talk) 23:04, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Seven}}
Thank you for more quality content! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:45, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

I'm ''still alive''

please contact me here ↗ AngryOldCanadian (OC) 2604:3D08:5776:7900:586F:5170:7AF9:ECD2 ↗ (talk) 21:46, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Ice Peak Formation ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Ice Peak Formation ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See Talk:Ice Peak Formation/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of I2Overcome -- I2Overcome (talk) 01:46, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Ice Peak ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Ice Peak ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See Talk:Ice Peak/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SnowyRiver28 -- SnowyRiver28 (talk) 12:45, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Snowshoe Lava Field ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Snowshoe Lava Field ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See Talk:Snowshoe Lava Field/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ZKang123 -- ZKang123 (talk) 11:48, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Ice Peak ↗ is on hold

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Ice Peak ↗ has been placed 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''on hold''', as the article needs some changes. See Talk:Ice Peak/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SnowyRiver28 -- SnowyRiver28 (talk) 04:27, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Ice Peak ↗ has passed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Ice Peak ↗ has 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''passed'''; congratulations! See Talk:Ice Peak/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SnowyRiver28 -- SnowyRiver28 (talk) 23:05, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Belcher Mountains ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Belcher Mountains ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Cannot find a single source for article subject beyond this article and mirrors of it, not even in Google Scholar. No further information, images coordinates or sources can be added.'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons ↗.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, the speedy deletion ↗ process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:30, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Snowshoe Lava Field ↗ is on hold

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Snowshoe Lava Field ↗ has been placed 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''on hold''', as the article needs some changes. See Talk:Snowshoe Lava Field/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ZKang123 -- ZKang123 (talk) 06:22, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Ice Peak Formation ↗ is on hold

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Ice Peak Formation ↗ has been placed 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''on hold''', as the article needs some changes. See Talk:Ice Peak Formation/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of I2Overcome -- I2Overcome (talk) 05:27, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Ice Peak Formation ↗ has passed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Ice Peak Formation ↗ has 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''passed'''; congratulations! See Talk:Ice Peak Formation/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of I2Overcome -- I2Overcome (talk) 01:26, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Snowshoe Lava Field ↗ has passed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Snowshoe Lava Field ↗ has 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''passed'''; congratulations! See Talk:Snowshoe Lava Field/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ZKang123 -- ZKang123 (talk) 05:43, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Tseax (disambiguation) ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Tseax (disambiguation) ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''WP:ONEOTHER ↗ disambiguation page. Can adequately be handled with hatnote directly from Tseax Cone ↗ to Ksi Sii Aks ↗.'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons ↗.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, the speedy deletion ↗ process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 10:21, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Mess Creek Escarpment ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Mess Creek Escarpment ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See Talk:Mess Creek Escarpment/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of I2Overcome -- I2Overcome (talk) 23:01, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Desolation Lava Field ↗ is on hold

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Desolation Lava Field ↗ has been placed 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''on hold''', as the article needs some changes. See Talk:Desolation Lava Field/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Crystalite13 -- Crystalite13 (talk) 05:26, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Williams Cone ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Williams Cone ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See Talk:Williams Cone/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 18:41, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Williams Cone ↗ is on hold

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Williams Cone ↗ has been placed 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''on hold''', as the article needs some changes. See Talk:Williams Cone/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 19:07, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Williams Cone ↗ has passed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Williams Cone ↗ has 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''passed'''; congratulations! See Talk:Williams Cone/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 00:45, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Mess Creek Escarpment ↗ is on hold

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Mess Creek Escarpment ↗ has been placed 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''on hold''', as the article needs some changes. See Talk:Mess Creek Escarpment/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of I2Overcome -- I2Overcome (talk) 03:23, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Desolation Lava Field ↗ has passed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Desolation Lava Field ↗ has 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''passed'''; congratulations! See Talk:Desolation Lava Field/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Crystalite13 -- Crystalite13 (talk) 01:28, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Mess Creek Escarpment ↗ has passed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Mess Creek Escarpment ↗ has 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''passed'''; congratulations! See Talk:Mess Creek Escarpment/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of I2Overcome -- I2Overcome (talk) 22:44, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

</div>
</div>

Possible conflict of interest in editing of Douglas Lake Member article.

Hi, I just reverted what I judged to be edit that eliminated critisism ↗ of research by Greg Retallack in the Douglas Lake Member ↗ article, which you edited a number of times. The edit is by Retallack. I suspect that is a conflict of interest. Should I report it somewhere or simply note it on his talk page or in the comments? Paul H. (talk) 19:00, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

:{{ping|Paul H.}} Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard ↗. '''Volcanoguy''' 19:14, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Fracture zones

The fracture zone nomination has been relisted. You may want to alert some of the Wikiprojects that may not know that this discussion exists. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 09:06, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Tseax Cone ↗ scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article ↗ for 3 January 2026. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 2026 ↗, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/January 2026 ↗. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be left there by those who assist the coordinators by reviewing the blurbs. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors ↗ from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! SchroCat (talk) 08:57, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
{{User QAIbox
| image = Hazel in bloom near Leine, Döhren.jpg
| image_upright = 0.8
| bold = story · music · places
}}
Thank you today for the article, "about one of the youngest volcanoes in Canada. According to legends of the local Nisga'a people, it caused 2,000 deaths and the destruction of at least three villages. This would make it the deadliest geological disaster in Canada and the second-worst natural disaster in Canadian history by death toll, succeeded only by the 1775 Newfoundland hurricane which caused at least 4,100 fatalities. Tseax Cone has therefore been described as the deadliest volcano in Canada."! - happy new year! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:01, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Bryant Pass ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Bryant Pass ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Lacking sources, so fails :WP:GEOLAND ↗.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time. JoeNMLC (talk) 15:26, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge ninth anniversary

</noinclude>{| style="border: 2px solid gray; background-color: #FFFFF0; vertical-align: middle;"
|rowspan="2" | 100px ↗
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" |'''The Gold Maple Leaf Award'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | This maple leaf is awarded to '''Volcanoguy''' for three Featured Article expansions and fifteen Good Article expansions focusing on the '''Mount Edziza volcanic complex ↗''', and other improvements to British Columbia geology articles, during the ninth year of The 10,000 Challenge ↗ of WikiProject Canada ↗. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 21:26, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
|}

Mount Edziza ↗ scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article ↗ for 2 February , 2026. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/February 2026 ↗, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/February 2026 ↗. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be left there by user:JennyOz ↗, who assists the coordinators by reviewing the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors ↗ from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! Gog the Mild (talk) 22:15, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
{{User QAIbox
| image = Crocus meadow, Ehrenbach.jpg
| image_upright = 1.3
| bold = story · music · places
}}
Thank you today for the article "about one of the highest and most prominent volcanic peaks in Canada, as well as one of Canada's highest threat volcanoes. Like my previous FAC, Volcanism of the Mount Edziza volcanic complex, it cites Jack Souther a lot because he was the only geologist to have studied the mountain in detail. The mountain has received some studies by other scientists since 1992, but they are small in comparison. With that being said, there doesn't seem to be much data regarding the retreat of Mount Edziza's glaciers."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:38, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

What fine work. Thank you. I also looked at Coffee Crater, which also looks great, and I was wondering when we're doing the WMF-sponsored trip of the entire area. Thanks for making us look good. Drmies (talk) 16:19, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

:{{ping|Drmies}} Thanks. If there is ever a WMF-sponsored trip of the entire area, I hope someone will take more photos to be used in WP articles. Photos are lacking because the Edziza area is in a remote location. '''Volcanoguy''' 17:35, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
:: Today's main page ↗ features four biographies I helped to bring there, two women and two men, three opera singers (one pictured, those for the others are not free) and an actor, - a record for me, I believe ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:22, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Prod

Hi. You might have seen it already, but I wanted to notify you of this PROD I just saw: Ootsa Lake Formation ↗. Thought you'd have an opinion. Cheers, MediaKyle (talk) 12:08, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Done. I had an opinion. Drmies (talk) 16:40, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Rubble Creek expanded

Heya! Just letting you know I put up an expanded Rubble Creek article. I didn't say too much about the geology, The Barrier, etc, figuring there are links to pages with a lot more info on that stuff. I'm sure the page can still be improved a lot, but hopefully is fine as it is now. Also, I don't understand the geology all that well, certainly not as well as you! I am a little unclear about the creek passing underground—where exactly that happens and whether there are full on subterranean channels or if it's more like chaotic streaming through rubble. So I didn't say too much about it and hopefully didn't get anything wrong.

Anyway, just letting you know. What an interesting area. I knew a little about The Barrier and the hazards, but there's so much more wild stuff I didn't know. Really makes me want to get back up there and hike up to The Barrier and Garibaldi Lake. The one time I was there we hiked only briefly to stretch our legs after driving all day (we drove from Blue River near Wells Grey to Squamish that day), so we didn't get to The Barrier. It was "the best mushroom season in years", according to a Pemberton local paper we saw, and OMG we saw so many weird mushrooms. We also stopped at Brandywine Falls. The falls was eye catching for sure, but we spent most of the time turned around looking into the forest and the insane profusion of weird mushrooms. It was a great trip :-) Pfly (talk) 21:19, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

:{{ping|Pfly}} See this ↗ source on page 264: {{green|Lava-flows from the western crater of Red Mountain}} (Mount Price) {{green|have filled Stony Creek valley}} (Rubble Creek valley) {{green|for a distance of about a mile and a half, and their surfaces are entirely unglaciated. The resultant damming of the creek has produced Garibaldi Lake, whose waters now find their outlet along a channel between the edge of the lava-flow and the northern wall of the valley until they reach a recess in the lava which forms the basin of Lesser Garibaldi Lake. From this point onward the stream follows a subterranean channel under the lava flow, beneath which it reappears at the foot of the cliff known as "the Barrier," which has been formed by the undercutting of the lower end of the lava-flow. At times of exceptionally high water, a part of the stream flows over the surface to Stony Lake}} (Barrier Lake){{green|, and thence over the Barrier into the lower valley.}} Since this is an old source, I decided to check the accuracy of the last claim using Google Earth. I didn't see a continuous flow of water from Barrier Lake into the lower valley so that claim probably still holds to this day. '''Volcanoguy''' 03:05, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of The Barrier ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article The Barrier ↗ is 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''under review'''. See '''Talk:The Barrier/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A.Cython -- A.Cython (talk) 11:56, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of The Barrier ↗ is on hold

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article The Barrier ↗ has been placed 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''on hold''', as the article needs some changes. See '''Talk:The Barrier/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A.Cython -- A.Cython (talk) 19:34, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of The Barrier ↗ has passed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article The Barrier ↗ has 20px|alt=|link= ↗ '''passed'''; congratulations! See '''Talk:The Barrier/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing ↗ somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down.  Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A.Cython -- A.Cython (talk) 21:34, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

:{{ping|A.Cython}} I've removed most of the quotes from the "Outburst floods" section in this article. '''Volcanoguy''' 23:09, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
::Thanks, I hope you found my comments helpful. Good luck if you take the article to FA. '''A.Cython(talk)''' 00:20, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
:::I appreciated your comments for both this and the Silverthrone Caldera articles; they were very helpful, thank you. Silverthrone is still at FAC, but I might take The Barrier article to FA at some point as well. A peer review for the Big Raven Plateau ↗ article may be next. '''Volcanoguy''' 02:43, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Promotion of Silverthrone Caldera ↗

Bowdlerizing names

How can the name on the entry sign to a park not be in a "reliable source"? Especially when it's named as a memorial park and that's the name it's memorializing? — kwami (talk) 01:51, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

:WP:RELIABLESOURCE ↗ and WP:OFFICIALNAME ↗. '''Volcanoguy''' 02:58, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
:Even if article titles are supposed to use official names rather than the most commonly used one, BC Geographical Names ↗ gives Nisga'a Memorial Lava Bed Park ↗ as the official spelling. '''Volcanoguy''' 04:51, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Category:Tertiary calderas ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

A tag has been placed on :Category:Tertiary calderas ↗ indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category ↗, a category redirect ↗, under discussion at Categories for discussion ↗, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and removing the speedy deletion tag.   '''''L'''''iz '''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!''''' 17:22, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Category:Tertiary volcanoes ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

A tag has been placed on :Category:Tertiary volcanoes ↗ indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category ↗, a category redirect ↗, under discussion at Categories for discussion ↗, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and removing the speedy deletion tag.   '''''L'''''iz '''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!''''' 17:23, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Destubathon of the Americas ↗

You are invited to participate in the '''Destubathon of the Americas ↗''', a contest/editathon which will run from May 1 to May 31. The goal is to destub as many of our 475,000+ stubs for the Americas (from Alaska down to Chile) as possible. A good chance to have fun in expanding many of our old stale stubs and win up to £2000 ($2680) in Amazon vouchers for expanding stub articles. Sign up in the Contestants/participants section on the contest page if interested. Even if not interested in prizes you are still warmly welcome to participate in it as an editathon! Hopefully we can achieve something significant in the month of May together! ♦ ''Dr. Blofeld'' 17:43, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Silverthrone Caldera ↗ scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article ↗ for May 19, 2026. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 2026 ↗, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/May 2026 ↗. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be left there by user:JennyOz ↗, who assists the coordinators by reviewing the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors ↗ from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! Gog the Mild (talk) 20:33, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
{{User QAIbox
| image = Park near Lutheran church, Sopot, pansies.jpg
| image_upright = 0.9
| bold = story · music · places
}}
Thank you today for the article, "about a sketchily known volcano in British Columbia, Canada. Despite there having been very few studies conducted at the volcano due to its very remote location in the Coast Mountains, I was able to create a comprehensive article for it."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:44, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Map?

Do we have a map of the major volcanic systems in Canada? I understand most are part of the Pacific Ring of fire but I'm assuming there's got to be ancient systems in the rest of the country? I ask because the questions has come up a few times at the help desk and personally I'm interested as well. '''Moxy'''🍁 23:14, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

:Hi, I'm not aware of a map that shows all of the major volcanic systems throughout Canada. There are indeed much older volcanic systems outside of British Columbia and Yukon. In fact, there are old volcanoes in every province and territory except for Prince Edward Island so it might not be accurate to say that most major volcanic systems in Canada are part of the Ring of Fire. Canada is a large country after all. Where are these help desk questions you are referring to? '''Volcanoguy''' 00:23, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
::I did not reply to any so I'm really not sure how to find them...... I think this is something that we should construct. '''Moxy'''🍁 00:28, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
:::We can't make a map of major volcanic systems throughout Canada without sources. By the way, Williams Cone ↗ is an FAC ↗. '''Volcanoguy''' 01:01, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Moxy}} I just thought that you might be interested in what I found in a 1979 book on volcanoes: "The Canadian Shield which occupies much of Ontario, Quebec, Labrador, northern Saskatchewan and Manitoba, the Northwest Territories and Baffin Island, contains some of the most ancient volcanoes on earth. It has over 150 volcanic belts (now deformed and eroded down to nearly flat plans) that range from 600 to 2800 million years old. Each belt probably grew by the coalescence of accumulations erupted from numerous vents, making the tally of volcanoes in the hundreds. Many of Canada's major ore deposits are associated with Precambrian volcanoes." '''Volcanoguy''' 16:17, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Roxy}} Not a map of major volcanic systems in Canada, but I remembered creating this map ↗ of kimberlites throughout Canada in 2010. '''Volcanoguy''' 14:27, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
::::wow nice '''Moxy'''🍁 14:32, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::{{ping|Moxy}} I've started a draft in User:Volcanoguy/sandbox2 for updating the Volcanism of Canada ↗ article. My plan is to bring this article up to at least GA class. However, since this is such a broad topic, I'm not sure if it would be possible to limit it under 9,000 words of readable prose per WP:SIZE ↗. '''Volcanoguy''' 15:47, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

An eruption of gratitude for you, and Wikipedians generally

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | {{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|100px ↗|100px ↗}}
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Surreal Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I've encouraged a lot of my acquaintances to start editing, and I always encourage them to ask even basic questions given how unintuitive this place can be for beginners. Today I got a new one! A relatively stranger, who had gotten my name as someone who might know something about Wikipedia, sent me a list he'd been collecting for several years of previous TFAs related to volcanic activity in Western Canada. He was bewildered. Why so many? Was there a software bug? Had a pro-volcano campaign hijacked the main page? I wonder if it occurred to him that the "culprit" could be a good, prolific volunteer. "Am I going nuts?" he asked, but suddenly I didn't know what to say, because I was struck that it truly *is* nuts that some volcano fan out there devotes so much of themself to the quiet and thankless toil of encyclopedic content, volcano-related and otherwise. It *is* nuts that there are so many others like you (like us?) who create an encyclopedia for fun, for free, for everyone. For one reason or another, I have erupted with gratitude tonight. Thanks! Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 23:37, 19 May 2026 (UTC)
|}

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive

{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0; color: black"
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''Good article nominations ↗ |''' June 2026 Backlog Drive
|rowspan=3|right|75px ↗
|-
|'''June 2026 Backlog Drive:'''
Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed.

Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points!

Interested in taking part? You can '''sign up here ↗'''.
|-
|colspan=2|'''Other ways to participate:'''

Join the conversations on our talk page ↗.

|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.
|}

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Eve Cone ↗ scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that Eve Cone ↗ has been scheduled as today's featured article ↗ for 1 July 2026. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 2026 ↗, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/July 2026 ↗. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be posted there. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors ↗ from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! Z1720 (talk) 00:30, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

Promotion of Williams Cone ↗

{{ivmbox
|image = Cscr-featured.svg
|imagesize=60px
|extracss=font-size:1.25em; font-family:Georgia;
|text = Congratulations, Volcanoguy! The article you nominated, '''Williams Cone ↗''', has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The '''nomination discussion ↗''' has been archived.{{parabr}}This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it ↗ to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, {{user0|David Fuchs}} via FACBot (talk) 23:06, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
}}
{{User QAIbox
| image = Geranium cultivar, Döhren.jpg
| image_upright = 0.9
| bold = story · music · places
}}
Congratulations, and thank you today for Eve Cone ↗, "about one of the most symmetrical and best-preserved cinder cones in Canada. It is also one of the youngest eruptive centres in the Desolation Lava Field, which is part of the Mount Edziza volcanic complex in northwestern British Columbia." --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:16, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

Link to "elevation"

Please note that I use User:Ohconfucius/script/Common Terms.js to find Wikilinks to remove. That script wanted to remove the links to "British Columbia" and ''both'' links to "elevation". Instead I merely removed the second link per MOS:LINKONCE ↗. '''Abductive''' (reasoning) 21:16, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

:I'm pretty sure things can be linked in both the introduction and the article body. '''Volcanoguy''' 23:39, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

Use of primary source

Unfortunately, the primary source used, the GVP subpage ↗, rounds all coordinates to the arcminute. For example, it gives Eve Cone ↗ as 57° 49' 0.00" N, 130° 40' 0.00" W which misses the cone. The coordinates for the Desolation Lava Field ↗ in that source also seem to point just outside the lava field, as depicted in the map in the article. Per precision table at WP:OPCOORD ↗, rounding to the tenth of a degree is called for. 57° 48′ N, 130° 36′ W is also 57.8° N, 130.6° W. '''Abductive''' (reasoning) 21:56, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

:{{ping|Abductive}} Please see the coordinates for the Desolation Lava Field now, are they better? '''Volcanoguy''' 23:28, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
::Looks good. Thanks for your editing efforts. '''Abductive''' (reasoning) 23:41, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

Wikimedia Canada Train the Trainer Program Survey / Sondage pour le programme de formation à la facilitation

Wikimedia Canada ↗ is developing a Train the Trainer program to train volunteers to lead Wikimedia workshops across the country and we'd love your input!

If you are interested in learning how to teach others to contribute to a Wikimedia project, please fill out our short survey ↗ by '''July 10, 2026'''. It only takes a few minutes and it will help us create a program that works for our community.

''You have received this message because you are on the Wikimedia Canada Interest list ↗. To remove yourself from the list, please click here ↗.''

_________

Wikimédia Canada ↗ élabore actuellement un programme de formation à la facilitation destiné à former des bénévoles à l’animation d’ateliers Wikimédia et nous aimerions connaître votre avis !

Si vous souhaitez apprendre à former d’autres personnes à contribuer aux projets Wikimédia, merci de répondre à notre bref sondage ↗ avant le '''10 juillet 2026''' afin que nous puissions créer un programme adapté à notre communauté. Cela ne vous prendra que quelques minutes.

''Vous recevez ce message car vous faites partie de la liste des personnes intéressées par Wikimédia Canada ↗. Pour vous désinscrire de cette liste, veuillez cliquer ici ↗.''

-- Wikimedia Canada ↗ via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:22, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

User Talk: Volcanoguy

Your GA ↗ nomination of Sheep Track Member ↗

Your GA ↗ nomination of Mount Edziza ↗

TFA

Editor experience invitation

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cerro Panizos/archive1

Concern regarding Draft:Volcano Group ↗

Your draft article, Draft:Volcano Group ↗

Promotion of Volcanism of the Mount Edziza volcanic complex ↗

Your GA ↗ nomination of Nahta Cone ↗

Thanks for your comment at the tectonic plate lowercasing RM, now relisted

Your GA ↗ nomination of Nahta Cone ↗

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Category:Border Ranges ↗

Nomination of :Subaqueous volcano ↗ for deletion

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Volcanism of the Mount Edziza volcanic complex ↗ scheduled for TFA

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge eighth anniversary

Your GA ↗ nomination of Tennena Cone ↗

Your GA ↗ nomination of Tennena Cone ↗

Promotion of Mount Edziza ↗

Your GA ↗ nomination of Spectrum Range ↗

Your GA ↗ nomination of Spectrum Range ↗

Your GA ↗ nomination of Spectrum Range ↗

TFA

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 19 §&nbsp;Natural disasters by year ↗

Your GA ↗ nomination of Cocoa Crater ↗

Your GA ↗ nomination of Cocoa Crater ↗

Your GA ↗ nomination of Kitsu Plateau ↗

Your GA ↗ nomination of Kitsu Plateau ↗

Your GA ↗ nomination of Coffee Crater ↗

Promotion of Tennena Cone ↗

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 February 5 §&nbsp;Category:Eponymous categories ↗

Your GA ↗ nomination of Coffee Crater ↗

Creek versus River?

Your GA ↗ nomination of The Pyramid (British Columbia) ↗

Your GA ↗ nomination of The Pyramid (British Columbia) ↗

Promotion of Tseax Cone ↗

Your GA ↗ nomination of Nanook Dome ↗

Your GA ↗ nomination of Nanook Dome ↗

Changing "geologic" to "geological": why?

Oxford Clay vs Oxford Clay Formation

The World Destubathon ↗

Your GA ↗ nomination of Eve Cone ↗

Your GA ↗ nomination of Eve Cone ↗

Your GA ↗ nomination of Eve Cone ↗

Categories

Your nomination of Big Raven Plateau ↗ is under review

Your nomination of Big Raven Plateau ↗ has passed

Promotion of Eve Cone ↗

Tintina Fault ↗

Your nomination of Exile Hill ↗ is under review

Your nomination of Exile Hill ↗ has passed

Precious anniversary

I'm ''still alive''

Your nomination of Ice Peak Formation ↗ is under review

Your nomination of Ice Peak ↗ is under review

Your nomination of Snowshoe Lava Field ↗ is under review

Your nomination of Ice Peak ↗ is on hold

Your nomination of Ice Peak ↗ has passed

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Belcher Mountains ↗

Your nomination of Snowshoe Lava Field ↗ is on hold

Your nomination of Ice Peak Formation ↗ is on hold

Your nomination of Ice Peak Formation ↗ has passed

Your nomination of Snowshoe Lava Field ↗ has passed

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Tseax (disambiguation) ↗

Your nomination of Mess Creek Escarpment ↗ is under review

Your nomination of Desolation Lava Field ↗ is on hold

Your nomination of Williams Cone ↗ is under review

Your nomination of Williams Cone ↗ is on hold

Your nomination of Williams Cone ↗ has passed

Your nomination of Mess Creek Escarpment ↗ is on hold

Your nomination of Desolation Lava Field ↗ has passed

Your nomination of Mess Creek Escarpment ↗ has passed

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Possible conflict of interest in editing of Douglas Lake Member article.

Fracture zones

Tseax Cone ↗ scheduled for TFA

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Bryant Pass ↗

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge ninth anniversary

Mount Edziza ↗ scheduled for TFA

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 19 § Natural disasters by year ↗

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 February 5 § Category:Eponymous categories ↗